28.01.2015 Views

Chaosophy - autonomous learning

Chaosophy - autonomous learning

Chaosophy - autonomous learning

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

wouldn't the highest aim of the MLFpo be the machinic and revolutionary<br />

construction of the non-Oedipal woman, instead of the<br />

confused exaltation of mothering and castration<br />

Let us return to the necessity of breaking up associations: dissociation<br />

not merely as a characteristic of schizophrenia but as a<br />

principle of schizoanalysis. The greatest obstacle to psychoanalysis,<br />

the impossibility of establishing associations, is on the contrary, the<br />

very condition of schizo analysis-that is to say, the sign that we<br />

have finally reached elements that enter into a functional ensemble<br />

of the unconscious as a desiring-machine. It is not surprising that<br />

the method called free association invariably brings us back to<br />

Oedipus; that such is its function. Far from testifying to a spontaneity,<br />

it presupposes an application, a mapping back that forces a<br />

preordained ensemble to associate with a final artificial or memorial<br />

ensemble, predetermined symbolically as being Oedipal. In reality,<br />

we still have not accomplished anything so long as we have not<br />

reached elements that are not associable, or so long as we have not<br />

grasped the elements in a form in which they are no longer associable.<br />

Serge Leclaire takes a decisive step when he sets the terms<br />

of a problem which, in his words, "everything ipels us not to<br />

consider straight in the face ... What is involved, in brief, is the<br />

conception of a system whose elements are bound together precisely<br />

by the absence of any tie, and I mean by that, the absence of any<br />

natural, logical, or significant tie," "a set of pure singularities."ll But,<br />

mindful of the need to remain within the narrow bounds of psychoanalysis,<br />

he takes the same step backwards: he presents the<br />

unbound ensemble as a fiction, its manifestations as epiphanies,<br />

which must be inscribed in a new restructured ensemble, if only<br />

through the unity of the phallus as the signifier of absence. Yet here<br />

indeed was the emergence of the desiring-machine, that which<br />

distinguishes it both from the psychic bonds of the Oedipal apparatus,<br />

and from the mechanical or structural bonds of the social<br />

! 103

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!