28.01.2015 Views

Chaosophy - autonomous learning

Chaosophy - autonomous learning

Chaosophy - autonomous learning

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

to constitute a machine through recurrence and communications; the<br />

existence of a "machinic phylum." Ergonomics comes close to this<br />

point of view when it sets the general problem, no longer in terms<br />

of adaptation or substitution-the adaptation of man to the<br />

machine, and of the machine to man-but in terms of recurrent<br />

communication within systems made up of men and machines. It<br />

is true that just as ergonomists become convinced that they are<br />

confining themselves in this way to a purely technological<br />

approach, they raise the problems of power and oppression, of<br />

revolution and desire, with an involuntary vigor that is infinitely<br />

greater than in the adaptive approaches.<br />

There is a classic schema that is inspired by the tool: the tool as<br />

the extension and the projection of the living being, the operation<br />

by means of which man progressively emerges, the evolution from<br />

the tool to the machine, the reversal in which the machine grows<br />

more and more independent of man .,. But this schema has many<br />

drawbacks. It does not offer us any means to apprehend the reality<br />

of desiring-machines and tneir presence throughout this circuit. It is<br />

a biological and evolutive schema, which determines the machine as<br />

an event occurring at a given moment in the mechanical lineage that<br />

begins with the tool. It is humanistic and abstract, isolating the productive<br />

forces from the social conditions of their exercise, involving<br />

a man-nature dimension common to all the social forms, to which<br />

are thus lent relations of evolution. It is imaginary, phantasmal and<br />

solipsistic, even when it is applied to real tools, to real machines,<br />

since it rests entirely on the hypothesis of projection (R6heim for<br />

example, who adopts this schema, shows the analogy between the<br />

physical projection of tools and the psychic projection of phantasies).!<br />

We believe on the contrary that it is necessary to posit,fiom<br />

the outset, the difference in nature between the tool and the<br />

machine: the one as an agent of contact, the other as a factor of<br />

communication; the one being projective, the other recurrent; the<br />

92 .:

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!