Chaosophy - autonomous learning

etraying itself For an tipsych ia try , political intervention constitutes
the prerequisite of all therapeutics. But doesn't the agreement
around the "negation of the institution," which has meaning only
if it is taken up by a real avant-garde and securely achored in social
reality, risk serving as a springboard for a new form of social repression,
this time at the level of global society and aiming at the very
status of madness
Basaglia states that with the medications that he administers
"the doctor calms his own anxiety in the face of a patient with
whom he does not know how to enter into contact nor find a common
language" (p. 117). An ambiguous and perhaps demagogic
expression: psychopharmacology is not, in itself, a reactionary
science! It is the context of its use that must be called into question.
Nosography, too, is perhaps a little rashly thrown overboard.
The ways of repression are sometimes subtle! Those who uphold
normality at any price can become more effective than the police!
With the best moral and political intentions in the world, one
may come to refuse the mad the -right to be mad; the claim that
"society is to blame" can disguise a way of suppressing all
deviance. Institutional negation would then become a denegation­
Verneinung in the Freudian sense-of the singular fact of
derangement. Before taking out an option on nosography, Freud
devoted himself to really giving a voice to neurotics, freeing them
from all the effects of suggestion. Giving up the idea of medical
suggestion in order to fall into collective suggestion would only
create an illusory benefit.
I think that Basaglia and his comrades might be led incisively
beyond some of their current formulations and to "bend" their ears
to mental alienation without systematically reducing it to social
alienation. Matters are relatively straightforward and rightfully
violent when it is a matter of repudiating repressive institutions.
Things are much more difficult when they concern our understanding
122 ;