28.01.2015 Views

Chaosophy - autonomous learning

Chaosophy - autonomous learning

Chaosophy - autonomous learning

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

All these machines are real machines. Hocquenghem is right in<br />

saying, "Where desire is active, there is no longer any place for the<br />

Imaginary," nor for the Symbolic. All these machines are already<br />

there; we are continually producing them, manufacturing them,<br />

setting them in motion, for they are desire, desire just as it isalthough<br />

it takes artists to bring about their <strong>autonomous</strong><br />

presentation. Desiring-machines are not in our heads, in our imagination,<br />

they are inside the social and technical machines themselves.<br />

Our relationship with machines is not a relationship of invention or<br />

of imitation; we are not the cerebral fathers nor the disciplined sons<br />

of the machine. It is a relationship of peopling: we populate the<br />

social technical machines with desiring-machines, and we have no<br />

alternative. We are obliged to say at the same time: social technical<br />

machines are only conglomerates of desiring-machines under molar<br />

conditions that are historically determined; desiring-machines are<br />

social and technical machines restored to their determinant molecular<br />

conditions. Schwitters' Merz is the last syllable of Komerz. It<br />

is futile to examine the usefulness or uselessness, the possibility or<br />

impossibility of these desiring-machines. Their impossibility and<br />

their uselessness become visible only in the <strong>autonomous</strong> artistic<br />

presentation, and there very rarely. Don't you see that they are<br />

possible because · they are; they are there in every way, and we<br />

function with them. They are eminently useful, since they constitute<br />

the two directions of the relationship between the machine and<br />

man, the communication of the two. At the very moment you say,<br />

"this machine is impossible," you fail to see that you are making it<br />

possible, by being yourself one of its parts, the very part that you<br />

seemed to be missing in order for it to be already working, the<br />

dancer-danger. You argue about the possibility or the usefulness, but<br />

you are already inside the machine, you are a part of it, you have put<br />

a finger inside, or an eye, your anus, or your liver (the modern<br />

version of "You are in the same boat ... ").<br />

106 !

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!