Chaosophy - autonomous learning

Power can only be maintained insofar as it relies on the semiologies
of signification: "No one can ignore the law." This implies
that no one can ignore the meaning of words. Linguists like Oswald
Ducrot insist on the fact that language is not simply an instrument
of communication, but also an instrument of power. 1 The law, as the
culmination of sexual, ethnic, and class struggles, etc., crystallizes in
language. The "reality" imposed by the powers-that-be is conveyed
by a dominant semiology. Therefore, one should not go from a principled
opposition between pleasure and reality, between a principle
of desire and a principle of reality, but rather, from a principle of
dominant reality and a principle of licit pleasure. Desire is forced to
maintain itself, as well as can be expected, in this space between
reality and pleasure, this frontier that power jealously controls
with the help of innumerable frontier guards: in the family, at school,
in the barracks, at the workshop, in psychiatric hospitals and, of
course, at the movies.
Thus, desire is so ruthlessly hunted down that it usually ends up
renouncing its objects and investing itself and its guardians on
these boundaries. The capitalist eros will turn into a passion for the
boundary, it becomes the cop. While bumping on the all-too-explicit
signs of the libido, it will take its pleasure from their hateful
contemplation. "Look at this filth." It will become the gaze, the
forbidden spectacle, the transgression, "without really getting into
it." All the morals of asceticism and sublimation consist, in fact, of
capturing the libido in order to identify and contain it within this
system of limits. I don't mean, here, to oppose centralism with spontaneism,
or the disciplines necessary for organizing the collectivity
with the turbulence of the "natural" impulses; nor is it a matter of
reducing this question to a simple case of morality or ideological
strategy of dominant powers in order to better control the exploited ...
The dualities morality/instinct, culture/nature, order! disorder,
master/slave, centrality/democracy, etc., appear to us to be insufficient
236 ,1