28.01.2015 Views

Chaosophy - autonomous learning

Chaosophy - autonomous learning

Chaosophy - autonomous learning

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

operation he had the year before. More than one of his lungs had to<br />

be removed. As a result, his tuberculosis worsened and chronically<br />

weakened his respiratory system until he died. He was exhausted<br />

in the full sense of the term by which he will later characterize the<br />

work of Samuel Beckett-an exhaustion which offered an opening<br />

and allowed for a true meeting, a presence for the other and a<br />

fruitful relationship. Meeting Guattari would be crucial for reviving<br />

his vital forces.<br />

As for Guattari, he disclosed his own weaknesses to his new<br />

friend, revealing aspects of the inhibition which led to his "extremist<br />

misfiring."2 The basis for this writing disorder, he admitted, was a<br />

lack of consistent work and theoretical readings, and a fear of diving<br />

back into what he had left fallow for too long. To these failings he<br />

added a complicated personal history with an upcoming divorce,<br />

three children, the clinic, conflicts of all kinds, militant groups,<br />

the FGERl ... 3 As for the theoretical elaboration itself, Guattari<br />

considered "concepts mere utensils, gadgets."4 For example, he<br />

used the concept of "vacuolar group" as a way of bringing out<br />

something less oppressive within militant organizations, also more<br />

conducive to rethinking singular phenomena. Guattari invented his<br />

concept of "transversality" in order to unsettle so-called "democratic<br />

centralism"5 in favor of "effectiveness and a breathing."6<br />

From their first encounter, both of them immediately identified<br />

their critical target: "the Oedipal triangle" and the familial reduction<br />

brought about by psychoanalytical discourse, the critique of which<br />

became the core of Anti-Oedipus, published in 1972. From the<br />

beginning their relation was located at the heart of theoretical<br />

stakes, based on an immediate friendship and intellectual affinity<br />

with an equal rigor on both sides. However, this friendship would<br />

never be fusional, and the use of vous would always be de rigueur<br />

between them, although they otherwise readily used the tu form.<br />

Coming from two different galaxies, each respected in their difference

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!