28.01.2015 Views

Chaosophy - autonomous learning

Chaosophy - autonomous learning

Chaosophy - autonomous learning

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

figures, and the encounters between independent series that are at<br />

the base of this society, a desire that elicits a love "for its own sake,"<br />

a love of capital for its own sake, a love of bureaucracy for its own<br />

sake, a love of repression for its own sake, all sorts of strange things<br />

such as "What does a capitalist desire from the bottom of his heart"<br />

and "How is it possible that men desire repression not only for<br />

others but for themselves" and so on.<br />

Secondly, the fact that desiring-machines are the internal limit,<br />

as it were, of the technical social machines is more easily understood<br />

if one bears in mind that the full body of a society, its<br />

engineering agency, is never given as such, but must always be<br />

inferred from terms and relations coming into play in that society.<br />

The full body of capital as a proliferating body, Money that produces<br />

more Money, is never given in itself. It implies a movement<br />

to the limit, where the terms are reduced to their simple forms<br />

taken in an absolute sense, and where the relations are "positively"<br />

replaced by an absence of ties. Consider the capitalist desiringmachine,<br />

for example, the encounter between capital and labor<br />

force, capital as deterritorialized wealth and labor capacity as the<br />

deterritorialized worker, two independent series or simple forms<br />

whose chance meeting is continually reproduced in capitalism.<br />

How can the absence of ties be positive One meets again with<br />

Leclaire's question stating the paradox of desire: how can elements<br />

be bound together by the absence of any ties In a certain sense, it<br />

can be said that Cartesianism, in Spinoza and Leibniz, has not<br />

ceased to reply to this question. It is the theory of real distinction,<br />

insofar as it implies a specific logic. It is because they are really<br />

distinct, and completely independent of each other, that ultimate<br />

elements or simple forms belong to the same being or to the same<br />

substance. It is in this sense, in fact, that a substantial full body<br />

does not function at all as an organism. And the desiring-machine<br />

is nothing other than a multiplicity of distinct elements or simple<br />

112,1

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!