28.01.2015 Views

Chaosophy - autonomous learning

Chaosophy - autonomous learning

Chaosophy - autonomous learning

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

familial power, rectified by psychoanalysis, functions by means of<br />

two primary parts: the symbolic phallus and castration, instruments<br />

of the alienation of woman and child. One recalls the tyrannical<br />

interrogation of Little Hans by his father under the supervision of<br />

Professor Freud. But before that, the mother's resistance must be<br />

subdued, compelling her to submit to psychoanalytical dogma. In fact,<br />

it never crosses her mind to object to her son's coming to join her in<br />

bed whenever he wants. The mother becoming the agent of phallic<br />

power, the attack on childhood is concentrated on the question of<br />

masturbation. One does not accuse him directly of masturbating;<br />

one imposes upon him the good, "castrating" explanation with<br />

regard to this question. One forces him to incorporate a particular<br />

system of signification: "What you desire-we know this better than<br />

you-is to sleep with your mother and to kill your father."<br />

The importance of submitting the child to the Oedipian<br />

code-and this at an early age-does not result from a structural<br />

or signifying effect, separate from history or society. It depends on<br />

capitalism's inability to fi-nd other ways of providing the family<br />

with an artificial consistency. In archaic societies, the child was<br />

relatively free in his movements until his initiation. But in a<br />

capitalist society, initiation begins with the pacifier: the motherchild<br />

relationship tends to be more and more strictly controlled<br />

by psychologists, psychoanalysts, educators, etc. In its older formulation,<br />

power was maintained as a paradigmatic series-fatherboss-king,<br />

etc., culnlinating in a discernible, incarnate, and<br />

institutionalized God. In its present formulation, incarnation is<br />

deterritorialized and decentered. It is everywhere and nowhere, and<br />

it depends on family models to arrange a refuge for it. But in their<br />

turn, the diverse psychoanalytic models of Oedipal triangulation<br />

appear too territorialized with regard to parental images and partial<br />

objects. Much more abstract, much more mathematical models of<br />

the unconscious have to be proposed.<br />

240 /

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!