28.01.2015 Views

Chaosophy - autonomous learning

Chaosophy - autonomous learning

Chaosophy - autonomous learning

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

all, because it was in itself the production of organized intensive<br />

states: neither form nor extension, neither representation nor projection,<br />

but pure and recurrent intensities. It sometimes happens,<br />

as in Picabia, that the discovery of the abstract leads to the<br />

machinic elements, while at other times, as in the example of<br />

many a Futurist, the opposite road is traveled. Consider the old<br />

distinction drawn by the philosophers of the Enlightenment, the<br />

distinction between representative states and affective states that do<br />

not represent anything. The machine is the affective state, and it is<br />

false to say that modern machines possess a perceptive capacity or a<br />

memory; machines themselves possess only affective states.<br />

When we contrast desiring-machines and Oedipus, we do not<br />

mean to say that the unconscious is mechanical (machines belong<br />

rather to metamechanics), or that Oedipus counts for nothing. Too<br />

many forces and too many people depend on Oedipus; there are too<br />

many interests at stake. To begin with, there would be no narcissism<br />

without Oedipus. Oedipus will prompt a great many moans and<br />

whimpers yet. It will inspire research projects that are more and<br />

more unreal. It will continue to nourish dreams and phantasies.<br />

Oedipus is a vector: 4, 3, 2, 1, 0 ... Four is the famous fourth<br />

symbolical term, 3 is the triangulation, 2 is the dual images, 1 is<br />

narcissism, and 0 is the death instinct. Oedipus is the entropy of the<br />

desiring-machine, its tendency to external abolition. It is the image<br />

or the representation slipped into the machine, the stereotype that<br />

stops the connections, exhausts the flows, puts death in desire, and<br />

substitutes a kind of plaster for the cracks; it is the Interruptrice<br />

(the psychoanalysts as the saboteurs of desire). For the distinction<br />

between the manifest content and the latent content, for the distinction<br />

between the repressing and the repressed, we must<br />

substitute the two poles of the unconscious: the schizo-desiring<br />

machine, and the paranoiac Oedipal apparatus, the connectors of<br />

desire, and its repressors. Yes, in fact, you will find as much of<br />

98 ,1

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!