28.01.2015 Views

Chaosophy - autonomous learning

Chaosophy - autonomous learning

Chaosophy - autonomous learning

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

one referring to the possible and the impossible, the other to the<br />

probability of a less-probable; the one acting through the functional<br />

synthesis of a whole, the other through real distinctions in an<br />

ensemble. Functioning as a component part in conjunction with<br />

other parts is very different from being an extension or a projection,<br />

or being replaced (an instance where there is no communication).<br />

Pierre Auger shows that a machine is constituted from the moment<br />

there is communication between two portions of the outside world<br />

that are really distinct in a system that is possible although less<br />

probable.2 One and the same thing can be a tool or a machine,<br />

according to whether the "machinic phylum" takes hold of it or not,<br />

passes or does not pass through it. Hoplite weapons existed as tools<br />

from early antiquity, but they became components of a machine,<br />

along with the men who wielded them, under the conditions of the<br />

phalanx and the Greek city-state. When one refers the tool to man,<br />

in accordance with the traditional schema, one deprives oneself of<br />

any possibility of understanding how man and the tool become or<br />

already are distinct components of a machine in relation to an actual<br />

machinic agency. And we believe moreover that there are always<br />

machines that precede tools, always phyla that determine at a given<br />

moment which tools, which men will enter as machine components<br />

in the social system being considered.<br />

Desiring-machines are neither imaginary projections in the<br />

form of phantasies, nor real projections in the form of tools. The<br />

whole system of projections derives from machines, and not the<br />

reverse. Should the desiring-machine be defined then by a kind of<br />

introjection, by a certain perverse use of the machine Let us take<br />

the example of the telephone exchange: by dialing an unassigned<br />

number, connected to an automatic answering device ("the number<br />

you dialed is not in service ... ") one can hear the overlay of an<br />

ensemble of teeming voices, calling and answering each other, crisscrossing,<br />

fading out, passing over and under each other, inside the<br />

/93

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!