28.01.2015 Views

Chaosophy - autonomous learning

Chaosophy - autonomous learning

Chaosophy - autonomous learning

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

art, social life, etc., is the exclusive concern of specialists. So many<br />

things that seemed to belong unquestionably to everyone, like<br />

water, air, energy, and art, are now about to become the property<br />

of new industrial and commercial branches. So why not fantasies<br />

and desire as well<br />

I am interested in a totally different kind of unconscious. It is<br />

not the unconscious of specialists, but a region everyone can have<br />

access to with neither distress nor particular preparation: it is open<br />

to social and economic interactions and directly engaged with<br />

major historical currents. It is not centered exclusively around the<br />

family quarrels of the tragic heroes of ancient Greece. This<br />

unconscious, which I call "schizoanalytic," as opposed to the<br />

psychoanalytic subconscious, is inspired more by the "model" of<br />

psychosis than that of neurosis on which psychoanalysis was built.<br />

I call it "machinic" because it is not necessarily centered around<br />

human subjectivity, but involves th'e most diverse material fluxes<br />

and social systems. One after the other, the old territories of Ego,<br />

family, profession, religion, ethnicity, etc., have been undone and<br />

deterritorialized. The realm of desire can no longer be taken for<br />

granted. This is because the modern unconscious is constantly<br />

manipulated by the media, by collective apparatuses and their<br />

cohorts of technicians. It is no longer enough to simply define it in<br />

terms of an intrapsychic entity, as Freud did when he was conceiving<br />

his different topics. Would it suffice to say that the machinic<br />

unconscious is more impersonal or archetypical than the traditional<br />

unconscious Certainly not, since its "mission" is precisely to<br />

circumscribe individual singularities more closely, in order to tie<br />

them down more strictly to social relations and historical realities<br />

of the "machinic age." Simply put, the questions raised by the<br />

unconscious no longer fall squarely within the realm of psychology.<br />

They involve the most fundamental choices for both society and<br />

desire, "existential choices" in a world which is criss-crossed by a<br />

/ 1 97

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!