28.01.2015 Views

Chaosophy - autonomous learning

Chaosophy - autonomous learning

Chaosophy - autonomous learning

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

are absolutely complementary: a politics of reenclosure on the<br />

person, the self, the appropriation of the other, hierarchy,<br />

exploitation, etc., and a politics of passive acceptance of the<br />

world such as it is.<br />

Against the notions of eros and eroticism, I would like to oppose<br />

those of desire and desiring-energy. Desire is not, like eros, tied down<br />

with the body, the person, and the law; it is no more dependent on<br />

the shameful body-with its hidden organs and its incestuous taboothan<br />

to a fascination with and to myths about the nude body, the all<br />

powerful phallus, and sublimation. Desire is constituted before the<br />

crystallization of the body and the organs, before the division of the<br />

sexes, before the separation between the familiarized self and the<br />

social field. It is enough to observe children, the insane, and the<br />

primitive without prejudice in order to understand that desire can<br />

make love with humans as well as with flowers, machines, or celebrations.<br />

It does not respect the ritual games of the war between the<br />

sexes: it is not sexual, it is transsexual. The struggle for the phallus, the<br />

threat of an imaginary castration, no more than the opposition<br />

between genitality and pregenitality, normality and perversion,<br />

fundamentally concern it. Nothing essential leads to the subjugation<br />

of the child, the woman, or the homosexual. In a word, it is not<br />

centered on dominant significations and values: it participates in<br />

open, asignifying semiotics, available for better or worse. Nothing<br />

depends here on destiny, but on collective arrangements in action.<br />

In conclusion, I must say of the cinema that it can be both the<br />

machine of eros, i.e., the interiorization of repression, and the<br />

machine of liberated desire. An action in favor of the liberty of<br />

expression should therefore not be centered a priori on erotic cinema,<br />

but on what I will call a cinema of desire. The real trap is the<br />

separation between erotic themes and social themes; all themes are<br />

at once social and transsexual. There is no political cinema on the<br />

one hand and an erotic cinema on the other. Cinema is political<br />

1)1 /245

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!