28.01.2015 Views

Chaosophy - autonomous learning

Chaosophy - autonomous learning

Chaosophy - autonomous learning

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

an important position in the field of family therapy. As for Guattari,<br />

he was very receptive to Elka'im's systemist theses, which had the<br />

merit of envisaging therapy in terms of groups and not of desocialized<br />

individuals. As a result, in January of 1975 they decided to<br />

create an international network together in Brussels meant to<br />

circulate information on experiments in progress. They named it<br />

'ternative Network to psychiatry." Through this engagement,<br />

Guattari expressed his desire to go beyond the theses of institutional<br />

psychotherapy towards a depsychiatrization of madness,<br />

taking the most innovative currents available as his starting points.<br />

In order to create this network, in 1975 Mony Elkaim managed<br />

to gather together Robert Castel and Franco Basaglia, in spite of<br />

the latter's disagreements with Guattari. Robert Castel helped create<br />

a friendly complicity between the two despite their divergences.<br />

The initial title 'ternative to the Sector" was quickly dismissed<br />

as too limited, and Basaglia's propoed 'ternative Network to<br />

Psychiatry" was adopted instead.33 Guattari fully involved himself<br />

in this network, which actively defended Franco Basaglia as well as<br />

the German antipsychiatrists.<br />

The Alternative Network served as a junction for various dissident<br />

psychiatric practices. After the inaugural assembly in Brussels,<br />

it sponsored many international meetings, for example in Paris<br />

(March 1976), Trieste (September 1977), Cuernavaca, Mexico<br />

(September 1978), and San Francisco (September 1980) ... The<br />

purpose of these gatherings was not to instill a new orthodoxy, but<br />

to be aware of what was being done elsewhere. In his interventions<br />

within the Network, Guattari insisted on this nonproselytizing<br />

attitude. In this domain, science could not set itself up as a unifying<br />

authority, because successful practices could only arise from a<br />

micropolitics whose singular nature was not limited in scale to<br />

analyzing small groups, but instead implied a permanent dialogue<br />

and a continuous process connecting it to the macro scale of the

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!