Chaosophy - autonomous learning

If we want to understand something about what is happening
in terms of desire in the social machine, we have to go through that
narrow pass that the object constitutes right now. It's not enough
to assert that everything is desire, but show how that happens. I
will add a final question: what do you use your "contraption" for
What relation can there be between the fascination of a flawless
machine and the true excitement of a revolutionary project That's
the question I'm asking you, on the level of action.
Roger Dadoun: In any case, your "machine" -or your "contraption"
[machinJ-works. It works very well in literature, for example,
for capturing the flow or the "schizo" circulation in Artaud's
Heliogabalus; it works for entering more deeply into the bipolar
schizoid/ paranoid oscillation of an author like Romain Rolland; it
works for a psychoanalysis of dreams-for Freud's dream, known
as "Irma's injection," which is theatrical in an almost technical
sense, with its staging, close-ups, etc., it's like a film. It remains to
be seen how this works for the -child ...
Henri Torrubia: Working in a psychiatric ward, I would especially
like to emphasize one of the nodal points of your theses on schizoanalysis.
You assert-with arguments that, to me, are very illuminating-the
primacy of social investment and the productive and
revolutionary essence of desire. This raises such theoretical, ideological,
and practical problems that you should expect a general outcry.
We know, in any case, that to undertake an analytical psychology
in a psychiatric establishment, without the possibility for "each"
person to keep questioning the institutional network itself, is either
a waste of time or, in the best of cases, won't go very far. In the
current climate, moreover, nothing can go very far. That being the
case, when an essential conflict emerges somewhere, when something
goes wrong, which is precisely the sign that something like
82 "