11.07.2015 Views

Adapting to Climate Change: Assessing the World Bank Group ...

Adapting to Climate Change: Assessing the World Bank Group ...

Adapting to Climate Change: Assessing the World Bank Group ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

CHAPTER 4ANTICIPATORY ADAPTATIONUSES AND LIMITATIONS OF CLIMATE MODELS4.8 Scientists have developed an increasingly sophisticated suite of computerizedmodels in order <strong>to</strong> understand human impacts on climate change. Global climatemodels (GCMs) project climate at a coarse resolution, typically 2.5° latitude x 2.5°longitude (77,000 square kilometers or larger). Regional climate models (RCMs) orstatistical downscaling methods zoom in on smaller areas (at resolutions as fine as 20 x20 kilometers), using GCMs as input. GCMs have been essential for climate changeresearch and for assessing global pathways <strong>to</strong> climate stabilization. As noted in chapter2, models have been useful in developing countries in raising awareness, setting <strong>the</strong>context for national-level action, and building technical capacity4.9 It has been irresistible <strong>to</strong> press <strong>the</strong>se newly developed scientific models in<strong>to</strong>service for guidance in practical project and program planning and analysis. The <strong>Bank</strong>has done so, sometimes in cutting-edge ways. The <strong>Bank</strong> also has supported localcapacity building in <strong>the</strong> development and use of <strong>the</strong>se models. But can <strong>the</strong>se modelsprovide <strong>the</strong> kind of information required by development planners and infrastructuredesigners (see Table 4.2)? Can <strong>the</strong>y, for instance, indicate how <strong>the</strong> magnitude of 1 in ahundred year floods will change in a particular watershed?4.10 <strong>Climate</strong> projections are built on an accumulation of uncertainties that limit <strong>the</strong>irprecision for certain purposes (IPCC 2007):There is uncertainty about <strong>the</strong> exact values of key physical parameters.Rowlands, Frame, and o<strong>the</strong>rs (2012), for instance, run thousands of variants of asingle climate model using equally plausible values for <strong>the</strong>se parameters, andobtain mean global warming estimates ranging from 1.4 <strong>to</strong> 3.0⁰ C by 2050.Different scientific groups have constructed competing models, and <strong>the</strong>re is noagreed means of discriminating among <strong>the</strong>m. (Ability <strong>to</strong> reproduce currentclimate conditions is no guarantee of <strong>the</strong> model’s predictive ability underunprecedented future conditions.)The ability <strong>to</strong> calibrate <strong>the</strong> models is limited by sparse observational data inmany parts of <strong>the</strong> world (see Figure 3.3), and this applies especially <strong>to</strong> locallydownscaled models.The models may be particularly challenged by mountainous regions, which areexpected <strong>to</strong> be particularly sensitive <strong>to</strong> climate change.Local and global climate, and climate change, impacts are strongly modulated byunpredictable human actions over <strong>the</strong> coming century, including <strong>the</strong> degree ofgreenhouse gas emissions, deforestation, and water use.There is inherent, chaotic variation in wea<strong>the</strong>r, not just day <strong>to</strong> day, but year <strong>to</strong>year and even decade <strong>to</strong> decade. Thus, a single climate model will (correctly)generate a range of different possible realizations of future climate patterns.64

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!