11.07.2015 Views

Adapting to Climate Change: Assessing the World Bank Group ...

Adapting to Climate Change: Assessing the World Bank Group ...

Adapting to Climate Change: Assessing the World Bank Group ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

ENDNOTESBackground Note <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> Interim Guidance on Land Use Planning Review of Environmentaland Social Considerations in <strong>World</strong> <strong>Bank</strong> Land Use Planning Projects—Key Findings andGood Practice)47 Some agencies have adopted very high level guidance encouraging assessment of climaterisk without providing context-specific advice.48Agreed SLWM indica<strong>to</strong>rs are income, yield and biophysical indica<strong>to</strong>rs changes.49 Pre 2006 closure.50 ISRO—India Space Research Organization Evaluations of Phase I and Phase II: ISRO.2009. ―Impact Assessment of Sujala Project: Final Report. Antrix Corporation, India SpaceResearch Organization. Bengaluru. June 2009.51 Baseline and control groups are established for <strong>the</strong> M&E for o<strong>the</strong>r than income, yield andbiophysical indica<strong>to</strong>rs (except forest cover)52 Economic analysis of a sample of 200 subprojects revealed considerable variability in <strong>the</strong>profitability of different types of activities. Consistently more profitable activities: poultryproduction, rice production, vegetable production, banana gardens, and grain milling.Consistently less profitable activities: production of basic cereals (sorghum, millet, beans,maize), small ruminant production, establishment of plant nurseries.53 Three scenarios depending on financial sustainability: 1. Assuming no fur<strong>the</strong>r fundingfor <strong>the</strong> incomplete sub-projects. 2. Assuming additional government resources for those thathad already received two tranches. 3.Assuming additional government resources for thosethat had received ei<strong>the</strong>r one or two tranches. The ERRs for <strong>the</strong>se were 9 percent, 15 percent,and 19 percent respectively, all lower than <strong>the</strong> 21 percent projected at appraisal.54 M&E by implementing agency has been adequate in <strong>the</strong> tracking of implementationprogress, but weak in providing an assessment of <strong>the</strong> impact on agricultural production andfarm incomes55 PEMBH State (<strong>Bank</strong>-financed) Micro-catchment Program, Plantio Dire<strong>to</strong> —minimumtillage56 From ICR: The project did not fully succeed in setting up an effective Moni<strong>to</strong>ring andEvaluation (M&E) system. This prevented <strong>the</strong> PMU from efficiently managing time,resources and project data and from taking appropriate and timely action.57 Including non-accounted benefits.58 (from 1.48t/ha (baseline) <strong>to</strong> 2.26t/ha)59 from 1.55t/ha <strong>to</strong> 1.84t/ha60 The area of settled rainy season rice grew from 37 ha <strong>to</strong> 47 ha, <strong>the</strong> area of settled dryseason rice increased from 8 ha <strong>to</strong> 15 ha, and <strong>the</strong> number of village vegetable gardensincreased from 103 <strong>to</strong> 185. But <strong>the</strong>re is no indication in <strong>the</strong> ICR of <strong>the</strong> level of yield andoutput increases.148

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!