11.07.2015 Views

Adapting to Climate Change: Assessing the World Bank Group ...

Adapting to Climate Change: Assessing the World Bank Group ...

Adapting to Climate Change: Assessing the World Bank Group ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Appendix ERoadsRoads are vulnerable <strong>to</strong> climate risks, and <strong>the</strong>se risks are likely <strong>to</strong> increase due <strong>to</strong>climate change. The main threats come through an increase in extreme rainfall ands<strong>to</strong>rm events (which can cause flooding or landslides that damage or destroy roadsections) and from sea level rise (which will worsen damage from s<strong>to</strong>rm surge andcoastal flooding and may even eventually lead <strong>to</strong> inundation). 68 The largest impactswill be for roads in upland areas with steep <strong>to</strong>pography, and for coastal roads inareas vulnerable <strong>to</strong> s<strong>to</strong>rm surge. For example, a <strong>World</strong> <strong>Bank</strong> analysis of <strong>the</strong> impac<strong>to</strong>n climate change on roads in Ethiopia found that in <strong>the</strong> absence of adaptivemeasures, costs <strong>to</strong> road users from climate events could double by 2050 (COWI2010).Normative ConsiderationsManaging climate risks has long been part of best practice in road design. Damagefrom s<strong>to</strong>rms and flooding can be reduced through physical measures (includingboth structural drainage and protective measures, and bio-engineering options suchas use of vegetation for slope stabilization or run-off management) and throughimproved capacity (for road maintenance, land management, warning systems, andemergency response systems). It is difficult <strong>to</strong> make broad claims about <strong>the</strong> costeffectivenessof particular measures, because <strong>the</strong> impacts vary widely depending on<strong>to</strong>pography, climate, and o<strong>the</strong>r fac<strong>to</strong>rs.Design features of roads have different lifetimes, hence different sensitivities <strong>to</strong>climate variability versus climate change. Short-lifetime features should be designedwith current climate variability in mind. For instance, pavement standards orembankment height can be readjusted <strong>to</strong> current temperature, flood, and trafficconditions when a road segment is rehabilitated—typically every 20 years. Withinthis timeframe, climate change is <strong>to</strong>o slow <strong>to</strong> affect pavement standards. 69 Longerlivedand more inflexible are drains, culverts, and bridges, so <strong>the</strong>se require moreconsideration of climate change impacts during <strong>the</strong>ir operating lifetime. Longestlivedof all is <strong>the</strong> decision on routing, which can affect spatial development patterns(and exposure <strong>to</strong> climate risk) for centuries. (See Box 4-2. in <strong>the</strong> main text.)Adaptive management and targeted improvements may be more efficient thanimmediate or blanket techniques. An analysis of road options in Mozambique underclimate change (Arndt and o<strong>the</strong>rs 2011) compares and contrasts a strategy ofadaptive management—gradually rehabilitating existing roads and building new117

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!