11.07.2015 Views

Adapting to Climate Change: Assessing the World Bank Group ...

Adapting to Climate Change: Assessing the World Bank Group ...

Adapting to Climate Change: Assessing the World Bank Group ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Integration of <strong>Climate</strong> <strong>Change</strong> Consideration in <strong>World</strong> <strong>Bank</strong> Protected Area ProjectsCHAPTER 4ANTICIPATORY ADAPTATION4.34 IEG examined <strong>the</strong> portfolio of biodiversity and protected area projects approvedbetween 2009 and 2011. Of 34 projects, 8 considered <strong>the</strong> sensitivity of <strong>the</strong> project <strong>to</strong> climatechange, of which half explicitly supported species migration through biodiversitycorridors, while <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r half assumed that reducing non-climate threats would supportincreased climate resilience in vulnerable ecosystems. Appraisals for 6 projects described<strong>the</strong> future threats of climate change in detail. Three projects supported climate vulnerabilityassessments and identified mitigation measures. All 8 projects proposed concrete actions <strong>to</strong>assist in climate change adaptation, including reforestation, creation of buffer zones, andpreparation of management plants. Proposals were generally based on thorough studiesand assessments of local adaptation needs.4.35 Moni<strong>to</strong>ring climate change adaptation in protected areas is still in its infancy. Onlythree projects made provisions <strong>to</strong> moni<strong>to</strong>r successes and failures of climate changeadaptation for biodiversity conservation. A fur<strong>the</strong>r three projects included moni<strong>to</strong>ringsystems that did not include climate change considerations in <strong>the</strong>ir design, while <strong>the</strong>remaining two projects did not implement moni<strong>to</strong>ring systems.MACROZONING OF RURAL LAND USE4.36 Conservationists have long advocated zoning of rural land use <strong>to</strong> maintainbiodiversity and ecosystem processes. Sophisticated optimization techniques have beenproposed <strong>to</strong> achieve ecological goals at least opportunity cost in foregone agriculturalproduction.4.37 Experience in land use regulation is mixed. On average, formal protected areas havereduced tropical deforestation. Protected areas that allow sustainable land use have beenmore successful than strictly protected areas. In Latin America, putting areas under <strong>the</strong>control of indigenous people has been extremely successful in deterring deforestation(Nelson and Chomitz 2011). However, macrozoning that attempts <strong>to</strong> regulate private usesof land has his<strong>to</strong>rically been unenforceable. <strong>Bank</strong>-executed zoning projects in Rondoniaand Ma<strong>to</strong> Grosso failed when <strong>the</strong>y imposed restrictions on powerful ranching and timberinterests. In Indonesia, 40 million people live in areas zoned for forests but lacking trees.4.38 A new approach appeals <strong>to</strong> banks as an instrument of enforcement. In Brazil, banksare beginning <strong>to</strong> decline <strong>to</strong> make loans <strong>to</strong> farmers and ranchers whose land is out ofcompliance with regulations. The Western Cape Province (South Africa) uses zoning <strong>to</strong>impose EIAs on those who would convert critical biodiversity areas (Box 4-4).77

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!