11.07.2015 Views

Proceedings of SerbiaTrib '13

Proceedings of SerbiaTrib '13

Proceedings of SerbiaTrib '13

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

performed from the surfactant solution in a volume<strong>of</strong> 20ml.In our first adsorption series withouttemperature control, a 1000ml stock solution <strong>of</strong>10 -2 M (~10cmc) CTAB was prepared at roomtemperature. Since the solubility <strong>of</strong> CTAB in waterwas low at room temperature, the solution washeated to 30-35°C. By dilution <strong>of</strong> this solution,prepared by adding the appropriate volume <strong>of</strong> ultrapure water, surfactant solution concentrationsranging from 10 -3 M (~cmc) to 10 -6 M (~cmc/1000)have been prepared. One option, called “CTABin/CTAB out“(figure 4), involves immersion andextraction from the surfactant solution at thenominal concentration. In the water dipping step,the mica samples were dipped for 30sec into 20ml<strong>of</strong> ultra pure water to remove the excess solutionand excess surfactant molecules.After the post-rinsing step, the modified micasurface was gently blown dry with nitrogen, beforethe AFM imaging or contact angle measurements.This type <strong>of</strong> protocol (at different concentrations)was repeated several times to also assess thereproducibility.During the first experiments in March, the roomtemperature was in the range 21±2°C, and a fewmonths later, in June, the conditions in thelaboratory were clearly different, 32±2°C. Asdocumented by the air temperature measuredoutside <strong>of</strong> our building, shown in figure 5, thetemperature during the summer 2003 has beenmuch higher than in spring. In several experimentsthe temperature was more than 30°C.Using the above described preparation protocolsa significant number <strong>of</strong> samples have beenprepared. The AFM images <strong>of</strong> two representativesamples obtained by the ″CTAB in/CTAB out″protocol at a concentration below the cmc areshown in figure 6. The AFM results observed at allsolution concentrations below the cmc (from 10 -4 Mto 10 -6 M), are very similar with the resultspresented in figure 6.a) 85°/30°Figure 4. ″CTAB in CTAB out″ experimentb) 82°/22°6. RESULTS OBTAINED WITHOUTTEMPERATURE CONTROLThe first two sets <strong>of</strong> experiments were realizedwithout temperature control, in March and June2003.Figure 5. Local temperature recorded in June 2003(measured at 12:40 PM in Zürich-SwissMeteo data)Figure 6. AFM images <strong>of</strong> CTAB on mica obtained withthe “CTAB in/CTAB out” protocol at a concentration <strong>of</strong>10 -4 M. Advancing and receding water contact angles arealso shown:a) in March 2003 and b) in June 2003A clear seasonal influence on SAMs adsorptionhas been observed in all experiments realizedwithout temperature control, regardless <strong>of</strong> theexperimental protocols. On the sample prepared inJune, where the air temperature outside <strong>of</strong> thelaboratory building was higher than in March(figure 5), a significant number <strong>of</strong> clusters <strong>of</strong> heightbetween 0.5nm to 3.8nm and the size around156 13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!