11.07.2015 Views

Proceedings of SerbiaTrib '13

Proceedings of SerbiaTrib '13

Proceedings of SerbiaTrib '13

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Figure 7. Accumulated tool life in milling <strong>of</strong> theemployed hardened steel IMPAX versus the entryimpact duration at various cutting speedsfunction <strong>of</strong> the cutting speed and the entry impactduration is:T0.15C3( v,te) CC41teC2e(1)The parameters C 1 , C 2 , C 3 and C 4 depend on thecutting tool and workpiece material data. Moreover,these parameters are functions <strong>of</strong> the cutting speedand the entry impact duration.Considering the entry impact duration, usingequation (1), the cutting tool life T 0.15 up to a flankwear land width VB equal to 0.15 mm can beestimated. Moreover, the number <strong>of</strong> cuts NC 0.15corresponding to a flank wear land width VB equalto 0.15 mm can be calculated based on theundeformed chip length and the cutting speed usingthe relation (2).T0 .15 NC0.15 lcuv (2)Bearing in mind that a number <strong>of</strong> cuts equal tozero corresponds to a tool wear VB also equal tozero and the number <strong>of</strong> cuts NC 0.15 is associated toVB equal to 0.15 mm, the evolution <strong>of</strong> the toolwear during milling can be calculated as describedin [9].6. COMPUTATION OF THE TOOL WEARIN MILLING AT CHANGEABLECUTTING CONDITIONSDuring milling a workpiece, the values <strong>of</strong>parameters influencing the tool wear developmentsuch as chip length, chip thickness, entry impactduration etc. may vary in the successive tool paths.Considering these circumstances, for computing thetool wear developed during milling, themethodology explained in Figure 9, is applied [15,16].Figure 8. Accumulated tool life in milling <strong>of</strong> theemployed hardened steels versus the entry impactduration at various cutting speedsThis is due to comparatively higher hardness <strong>of</strong>NIMAX. Moreover, it is obvious that due toreasons described in [11, 12, 13, 14] stainless steelis difficult to cut.5. THE DEVELOPED MODEL FORDESCRIBING THE WEAR EVOLUTIONON COATED TOOLS IN MILLING BASEDON CUTTING EDGE ENTRY IMPACTDURATIONThe general form <strong>of</strong> the equations, shown inFigure 7, describing the accumulated tool life as aFigure 9. Determination <strong>of</strong> tool wear evolution inmilling at various cutting conditions13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13 17

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!