11.07.2015 Views

Proceedings of SerbiaTrib '13

Proceedings of SerbiaTrib '13

Proceedings of SerbiaTrib '13

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Table 7. Test results <strong>of</strong> oil samples for drawingoperations with classical formulation with chlorinatedparaffine and Syn ester 2.Neat oil for drawingSample 1 Sample 2ChlorinatedSyn ester 2,3paraffine, % m/m% m/m10Additive package, %Additive package,18m/m% m/m7Base oil, % m/m 56 Base oil, % m/m 73Vegetable oil,Vegetable oil,23% m/m% m/m10Results1 2Wear, 40 kg, mm 0,44 Wear, 40 kg,mm 0,35Welding point, N 4000 Welding point,N 4200V at 40 0 C, mm 2 /s 44,26Vat 40 0 C,mm 2 /s40,02Cu corrosionCu corrosion(3 h, 100 0 3aC)(3 h, 100 0 C)1bAcid number,Acid number, mg4,67mg KOH/grKOH/gr7,81which are prepared with Syn esters, as areplacement for chlorinated paraffine, shows:- test result <strong>of</strong> welding points has showed that atheavy operations such as a broaching with Synester 1 they do not achieve good results, although itis attempted to use synergistic effect <strong>of</strong> esters andadditives with active sulphur.- with stamping operations, which is alsoconsidered as heavy, welding points test showedthat with two different formulated Syn estes it isimpossible to achieve good results, which will alsoaffect application conditions- based on test results for steel pr<strong>of</strong>iles drawingoperations, one can conclude that Syn ester 2 canbe used for formulations intended for thatoperations, with reduced quantities <strong>of</strong> otheradditives.This is the start <strong>of</strong> one comprehensive research,in laboratory and application conditions, that arebeing done with additive manufacturers. Testresults shows that it is hard to achieve replacementfor chlorparaffins in formulations <strong>of</strong> heavymetalworking operations, like broaching, deepdrilling, stamping and others.Constant arguing about usage <strong>of</strong> chlorparaffinsand their allowed chain length, confuse both usersand manufacturers. But it initiated many studiesregarding that problematic and efforts to findadequate replacement for chlorparaffins, as soon aspossible.REFERENCESFigure 10. Test results <strong>of</strong> diameter wear with samplesfor drawing operations with classical formulationwith chlorparaffine and Syn ester 2.4. CONCLUSIONTest results <strong>of</strong> samples <strong>of</strong> neat oils intended foroperations: broaching, fine stamping and drawing[1] N. Canter: Special Report: Trends in extremepressure additives, Tribology & LubricationTechnology, September 2007., pp.10-17[2] T. Kelley, R. Fensterhein, A. Jaques : “Voices &Views”, Chlorinated Paraffins, Vol.59, No.4, April2009.[3] L. Rudnick, “Syntetics, Minerals oils, and Bio basedLubricants”, 2006[4] Internal documentation <strong>of</strong> additive manufacturer13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13 313

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!