11.07.2015 Views

Proceedings of SerbiaTrib '13

Proceedings of SerbiaTrib '13

Proceedings of SerbiaTrib '13

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

the semi-solid melt at this temperature (600 o C) andstirring <strong>of</strong> the slurry was performed manually for 5-10 minutes. The composite slurry was thensuperheated to 800 o C± 50 o C and a second stirringperformed using a mechanical stirrer. The stirringoperation was performed at a speed <strong>of</strong> 400rpm for10minutes before casting into prepared sandmoulds inserted with chills. The designations usedto represent each grade <strong>of</strong> the composites producedare presented in Table 3.Table 3. Composite Density and Estimated Percent Porosity.Sample CompositionDesignation RHA: SiCTheoreticaldensity(g/cm 3 )Experimentaldensity(g/cm 3 )%PorosityA0 0 wt% 2.700 2.655 1.675wt%B1 A (0:1) 2.721 2.700 0.77B2 B (1:3) 2.691 2.650 1.52B3 C (1:1) 2.660 2.640 0.75B4 D (3:1) 2.630 2.590 1.52B5 E (1:0) 2.599 2.579 0.777.5 wt%C1 A (0:1) 2.733 2.670 2.31C2 B (1:3) 2.689 2.640 1.82C3 C (1:1) 2.640 2.590 1.89C4 D (3:1) 2.595 2.570 0.96C5 E (1:0) 2.550 2.510 1.5710 wt%D1 A (0:1) 2.743 2.690 1.9D2 B (1:3) 2.680 2.650 1.11D3 C (1:1) 2.620 2.610 0.3D4 D (3:1) 2.560 2.50 2.34D5 E (1:0) 2.500 2.497 0.122.4 Density MeasurementThe experimental density <strong>of</strong> each grade <strong>of</strong>composite produced was determined by dividingthe measured weight <strong>of</strong> a test sample by itsmeasured volume; while the theoretical density wasevaluated by using the formula:ρ Al-Mg-Si / RHA-SiCp = wt. Al-Mg-Si × ρ Al-Mg-Si + wt. RHA ×ρ RHA + wt. SiC × ρ SiC (2.1)where, ρ Al-Mg-Si / RHA-SiCp = Density <strong>of</strong> Composite,wt. Al-Mg-Si = Weight fraction <strong>of</strong> Al-Mg-Si alloy, ρ Al-Mg-Si = Density <strong>of</strong> Al-Mg-Si alloy, wt. RHA = Weightfraction RHA, ρ RHA = Density <strong>of</strong> RHA, wt. SiC =Weight fraction SiC, and ρ SiC = Density <strong>of</strong> SiC.The experimental densities were compared withthe theoretical densities for each composition <strong>of</strong> theRHA-SiC reinforced composites produced; and itserved as basis for evaluation <strong>of</strong> the percentporosity <strong>of</strong> the composites using the relations [20]:% porosity = {(ρ T – ρ EX ) ÷ ρ T } × 100% (2.2)Where, ρ T = Theoretical Density (g/cm 3 ), ρ EX =Experimental Density (g/cm 3 ).2.5 Tensile PropertiesThe tensile properties <strong>of</strong> the composites wasevaluated with the aid <strong>of</strong> tensile tests performedfollowing the specifications <strong>of</strong> ASTM 8M-91standards [21]. The samples for the test weremachined to round specimen configuration with 6mm diameter and 30 mm gauge length. The testwas carried out at room temperature using anInstron universal testing machine operated at astrain rate <strong>of</strong> 10 -3 /s. Three repeat tests wereperformed for each grade <strong>of</strong> composite produced toguarantee repeatability and reliability <strong>of</strong> the datagenerated. The tensile properties evaluated from thestress-strain curves developed from the tension testare - the ultimate tensile strength (σ u ), the 0.2% <strong>of</strong>fsetyield strength (σ y ), and the strain to fracture (ε f ).2.6 Fracture Toughness EvaluationThe fracture toughness <strong>of</strong> the composites wasevaluated using circumferential notch tensile (CNT)specimens [22]. Samples for the CNT testing weremachined having gauge length, specimen diameter(D), notch diameter (d), and notch angle <strong>of</strong> 30, 6,4.5mm, and 60 o respectively. The specimens werethen subjected to tensile loading to fracture usingan Instron universal testing machine. The fractureload (P f ) obtained from the load – extension plotsgenerated from the CNT testing were used toevaluate the fracture toughness using the empiricalrelations by Dieter [23]:K 1C =P f /(D) 3/2 [1.72(D/d)–1.27] (2.3)where, D and d are respectively the specimendiameter and the diameter <strong>of</strong> the notched section.The validity <strong>of</strong> the fracture toughness valuesobtained was determined using the relations inaccordance with Nath and Das [24]:D ≥ (K 1C /σ y ) 2 (2.4)Three repeat tests were performed for eachcomposite composition and the results obtainedwere taken to be highly consistent if the differencebetween measured values for a given compositecomposition is not more than 2%.2.7 Microstructural ExaminationA JSM 7600F Jeol ultra-high resolution fieldemission gun scanning electron microscope (FEG-SEM) equipped with an EDS was used for detailedmicrostructural study and for determination <strong>of</strong> theelemental compositions <strong>of</strong> the composites.162 13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!