11.07.2015 Views

Proceedings of SerbiaTrib '13

Proceedings of SerbiaTrib '13

Proceedings of SerbiaTrib '13

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

f M3 F ⋅ R= ⋅ , (6)4 N ⋅ rwhere R – radius <strong>of</strong> the disc, [m]; r – radius <strong>of</strong> theimpress on the sample, [m]; N – normal force, [H]; F –peripheral force on the disc, [H].quality and accuracy levels at the stage <strong>of</strong>machining and takes into consideration thetribological properties <strong>of</strong> coated tools, has beendeveloped. The methodology can estimatetechnological conditions <strong>of</strong> turning and solve aninverse task – it can estimate roughness, residualstress and strain hardening. The algorithm forcalculation <strong>of</strong> required technological conditions <strong>of</strong>turning was implemented in the s<strong>of</strong>tware (figure 7).Opportunity to choose oredit a function <strong>of</strong> frictionFig. 5. The flow chart <strong>of</strong> one-ball adhesiometer; 1 –samples <strong>of</strong> the work material; 2 – indenter <strong>of</strong> the toolmaterial; N – normal force, which impress the indenter[H]; F – peripheral force, which roll the disc, [H].Figure 6 shows the friction coefficient, whichwas determined for different temperatures andcombinations <strong>of</strong> work materials – coated indenter(pin).Figure 6. The influence <strong>of</strong> the temperature on afriction coefficient; work material – heat-resistant alloyEI437; tool material – carbide material H10F;nanostructured coatings <strong>of</strong> indentor: H10F (withoutcover); (Ti;Si)N; (Ti;Si;Al)N;TiB 2 ; Al 2 O 3.Thus if the magnitude <strong>of</strong> the criterion B 1 <strong>of</strong>cover 1 and the functions <strong>of</strong> friction f M = f(θ) <strong>of</strong>cover 1 and 2 like the dependence <strong>of</strong> frictioncoefficient on the temperature θ are known, themagnitude <strong>of</strong> a unknown criterion B 2 <strong>of</strong> cover 2can be approximately estimated by means <strong>of</strong>correcting coefficient:cov er1Mcov er2Mfk = (7)fcov er1 cov er2where f M , f M – adhesion component<strong>of</strong> the friction coefficient <strong>of</strong> work material withcover 1 and 2.On the base <strong>of</strong> obtained results <strong>of</strong> experimentsthe methodology for calculation <strong>of</strong> technologicalconditions <strong>of</strong> turning, which provides requiredFig. 7. The s<strong>of</strong>tware for calculation <strong>of</strong> requiredtechnological conditions <strong>of</strong> turning.In order to check the obtained mathematicalmodels, the comparison <strong>of</strong> the experimental andcalculated data was performed. The investigation <strong>of</strong>the parameters <strong>of</strong> surface layer has been performedon the machined parts “ring”. The conditions <strong>of</strong>turning <strong>of</strong> the parts “ring”: work material –stainless steel EK26; tool material – carbidematerial VK6R; tools geometry: φ = φ 1 = 45°, γ =8°; α = 7°, r = 1,2 mm; cutting rate: t = 0,75 mm; S= 0,2 mm/rev; nanostructured coatings <strong>of</strong> tool:(Ti;Si)N; (Ti;Si;Al)N.The results <strong>of</strong> experiments (Table 3) have beenclearly shown, that coated tool reduces themagnitude <strong>of</strong> the roughness, residual stress andstrain hardening in according with the magnitude <strong>of</strong>friction coefficient. The calculation <strong>of</strong> theparameters <strong>of</strong> the surface layer was performed bymeans <strong>of</strong> mathematical models presented in [2] ands<strong>of</strong>tware. The parameters <strong>of</strong> the roughness Ra andRz reduce on the average 5 %, therefore the maincause leading to the formation <strong>of</strong> the roughness aretools geometry, feed rate, vibration and so on, butnot the cover <strong>of</strong> tool. The strain hardening reduceson 20 % as compared with uncoated tool.In order to check our obtain data we havecompared the experimental and calculateddistribution diagrams <strong>of</strong> tangential residual stress.The using <strong>of</strong> coated tool leads to the considerablereduces <strong>of</strong> adverse tensile residual stresses.The distribution diagrams <strong>of</strong> the tangentialresidual stress are shown on a Figure 8.202 13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!