11.07.2015 Views

Proceedings of SerbiaTrib '13

Proceedings of SerbiaTrib '13

Proceedings of SerbiaTrib '13

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

day later, at a room temperature <strong>of</strong> 22°C, reveals asubstantially different SAM as shown in figure 7.c.Upon cooling <strong>of</strong> micellar CTAB solution from theinitial value ~30°C to 22°C, the solution thenconsists <strong>of</strong> crystals, monomers and micelles. As aconsequence <strong>of</strong> such structural changes in thesolution, the complex morphology (figure 7.c) isnot surprising. A distinction between monolayer orbilayer formation is not readily possible from AFMimages above (figure 7). The applied test, notdescribed here, on the samples in severalexperiments, suggested bilayer formation even atconcentration 10 -4 M.8. CONCLUSIONFigure 8. The structural changes in the CTAB solutionin the performed experiments, such as heating/coolingcycle <strong>of</strong> solution (marked as hysteresis) and the dilution<strong>of</strong> the solution, both above the cmcNamely, solution used in the both experiments(10 -4 M) has been prepared by dilution <strong>of</strong> a 10 -2 Mstock solution. The room temperature in March(21±2°C) was slightly below the Krafft temperature<strong>of</strong> CTAB and we could expect that this stocksolution mainly consisted <strong>of</strong> monomers. The sameargument applies, <strong>of</strong> course, also to the dilutedsolution (10 -4 M).In June, however, a significant daily temperaturevariation, with temperatures clearly above theKrafft temperature, has been recorded, particularlyin the days before the described adsorptionexperiment. It is to be expected that the solutionstructure <strong>of</strong> the stock solution is metastable andcomplex. The diluted solution may thus not be inthermodynamic equilibrium and consists <strong>of</strong>micelles and monomers. The clusters seen on thesample prepared under such conditions (figure 7.b)can be interpreted as micelle, adsorbed in differentshapes and sizes.The results shown in figures 6 and 7 clearlydemonstrate the temperature influence on thesurfactant films, morphology formed in differentseasons <strong>of</strong> 2003. The variety <strong>of</strong> adsorbed filmmorphologies in uncontrolled conditions above thecmc can also be explained by structural changes inthe stock solution. Namely, warming up the highlyconcentrated stock solution (10 -2 M) to some 30°C(above the Krafft temperature) will result in theformation <strong>of</strong> micelles. Since the film shown infigure 7.b. has been adsorbed at a temperature <strong>of</strong>24.5°C, which is near the Krafft temperature, wemight expect the presence <strong>of</strong> some aggregates inthe solution and also on the mica surface. Some <strong>of</strong>the micelles are expected to transform into surfacelayers.The repetition <strong>of</strong> the same experiment oneThe performed experiments describe theadsorption <strong>of</strong> quaternary ammonium surfactantsonto anionic, atomically smooth, muscovite mica.The surfactant films on mica, formed according todescribed experimental protocols, werecharacterized by contact angle measurements andby AFM. We have observed that SAMs can havecompletely different properties, depending on themeteorological conditions, influenced bytemperature. These results suggested thattemperature can influence all steps in adsorptionprocedure, from solution preparation to the rinsingstep. The fact that the Krafft temperature range <strong>of</strong>CTAB (~25°) is around room temperature, makesthis system appear particularly complex.The dynamic CA experiments and AFMmeasurements have shown that the exact protocol<strong>of</strong> solution and self-assembled monolayer (SAM)preparation can substantially influence the stability<strong>of</strong> the hydrophobic layer, as well as thehydrophobicity. The results indicate that themorphology and the homogeneity <strong>of</strong> SAMs dependon many parameters, and the main reason for that isprobably the molecular structure <strong>of</strong> the solution,controlled by the temperature and concentration <strong>of</strong>the solution.In this model case <strong>of</strong> quaternary ammoniumsurfactants, the formation <strong>of</strong> homogeneous, wellorderedand reproducible monolayers is a verychallenging task. In order to assess such complexsystems, systematic variation <strong>of</strong> a great number <strong>of</strong>parameters was a necessary procedure.ACKNOWLEDGEMENTSThe author would like to gratefully acknowledgethe support in obtaining and understanding thepresented results provided by her mentors, NicholasD. Spencer and Manfred Heuberger, members <strong>of</strong>the Laboratory for Surface Science and Technology(LSST), a part <strong>of</strong> the Department <strong>of</strong> Materials at the158 13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!