11.07.2015 Views

Proceedings of SerbiaTrib '13

Proceedings of SerbiaTrib '13

Proceedings of SerbiaTrib '13

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

μm, compared with Figure 17, wich shows theeffect <strong>of</strong> running on the wear behaviour <strong>of</strong> surfacewith R a = 0.045 μm.A63A64Figure 16. The effect <strong>of</strong> running-in on the wearbehaviour <strong>of</strong> the surface with R a = 0.015 μm, t = 5 min,Pr 998. The bush from previous determination was used.A65A67A69A66A68A70Figure 17. The effect <strong>of</strong> running-in on the wearbehaviour <strong>of</strong> the surface with R a = 0.045 μm, t = 5 min,samplez 999, (new bush) 1000 and 1001 (with the bushfrom previous determination).Different roughness used has caused not only adifference between worn volume values, but also inthe aspect <strong>of</strong> wear imprint (wear type). In the case<strong>of</strong> surfaces with R a = 0.015 μm, R a = 0.075 μm, (t=3 sec.) and R a = 0.19 μm, (t =3 sec.), the wear is <strong>of</strong>adhesive type (metallic shape with pronouncedscars). In case <strong>of</strong> surfaces with R a = 0.045 μm,oxidative wear type is prevailing. While reducingthe wear rate as a result <strong>of</strong> surface compliance,surfaces with R a = 0.075 μm and R a = 0.19 μm alsogo in oxidative wear regime.In the case <strong>of</strong> super-finished surfaces, with R a =0.015 μm and R a = 0.045 μm, a favourableinfluence <strong>of</strong> running in is not observed.For rouhness R a = 0.015 μm, R a = 0.075 μm andR a = 0.19 μm, the results obtained for the volume <strong>of</strong>worn material, are consistent with the strain <strong>of</strong>contact, determined by the lubricant film parameterh min / σ.For surfaces with rouhness R a = 0.045 μm, therewas observed a running-in influence. After the first5 minutes <strong>of</strong> operation, the entire contact surface iscovered with oxide. The imprint obtained afteranother 5 minutes, with the same bush, has aparticular form, oxidative wear area restricting thehalf at outcome <strong>of</strong> the loaded area (sample 1001).It follows that after running-in, lubricationconditions improve.In the case <strong>of</strong> super-finished surfaces, afavourable influence <strong>of</strong> running-in is not observed.4.2. Influence <strong>of</strong> initial roughness on the wearand friction coefficientSurface wear, a quantity determined by thefraction <strong>of</strong> area in contact, should be a monotonefunction <strong>of</strong> film parameter h / σ. The minimumvalue <strong>of</strong> wear should coincide with the minimumvalue <strong>of</strong> surface roughness.A large number <strong>of</strong> determinatons <strong>of</strong> wear, withfour roughness have been made: R a = 0.015 μm;R a = 0.045 μm; R a = 0.075 μm si R a = 0.19 μm.Mean values <strong>of</strong> volume <strong>of</strong> worn material for thefour roughness are:R a = 0.015 μm→V u = 7.0 x10 -5 mm 3 → μ = 0.038;R a = 0.045 μm→V u = 7.0 x10 -6 mm 3 → μ = 0.050;R a = 0.075 μm→V u = 3.7 x10 -5 mm 3 → μ = 0.038;R a = 0.190 μm→V u = 1.0 x10 -3 mm 3 → μ = 0.078.Simultaneously with the surface wear, thefriction coefficient was also measured.In Fig. 18 reprezentative images for three <strong>of</strong> thefour roughnesses are presented.A75A79A81A76A80A82Figure 18. The effect <strong>of</strong> running-in on the wearbehaviour <strong>of</strong> the surface with R a = 0.015 μm, t = 5 min,Pr 998. S-a folosit bucsa de la determinarea precedenta.13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13 339

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!