11.07.2015 Views

Proceedings of SerbiaTrib '13

Proceedings of SerbiaTrib '13

Proceedings of SerbiaTrib '13

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

c)a)Figure 2: SEM images and microstructuralcharacterization <strong>of</strong> thermal spray coatings: a) NiCr80/20, b) WC CoCr 18/4 and c) NiCr 80/20+ Cr 2 O 3 .b)Table 3: Results <strong>of</strong> thermal spray coatings’characterization.Coating Thickness[µm]Porosityvol.%HardnessHV 0,3NiCr 98±16 6.5 359±18WCCoCr 105±15 3.45 1027±21NiCr+Cr 2 O 3 (38+187) ±255.5+10.1 (341+1118)±24As can be observed, the three types <strong>of</strong> thermalspray coatings present different thickness andporosity. The porosity, acquired by image analysis,is higher for the coatings deposited by APStechnique compared to the HVOF deposits. Thisdifference could be related to both powders sizeand impact velocity, that is lower in APS techniquewith respect to HVOF. Indeed, the difference inkinetic energy <strong>of</strong> the molten powders, that is higherin HVOF technique, leads to a different density ondeposited coating. The hardness acquired isassociated to the material deposited and the valuesacquired are similar to data available in scientificliterature for thermal spray coatings [1-13].The SEM micrographs obtained on cross section<strong>of</strong> Ni/SiC composite coatings previously etched(acetic acid: nitric acid 1:1) are shown in Fig.3. InTab. 4 are listed the electrodeposited coatings’properties.Table 4: Results <strong>of</strong> Ni/SiC electrodepositscharacterization.Coating Thickness[µm]SiC wt.%HardnessHV 0.3Ni 78±7 - 172±7Ni/µSiC 73±8 0.8 247±8Ni/nSiC 75 ± 5 0.15 270 ±9Figure 3: SEM images and microstructuralcharacterization <strong>of</strong> electrodeposited coatings:a) pure Ni, b) Ni/µSiC and c) Ni/nSiC.The microstructure <strong>of</strong> the electrodeposits iscolumnar. In the case <strong>of</strong> the pure Ni the metalcolumns are oriented along the direction <strong>of</strong>electrical fields. The addition <strong>of</strong> SiC micro-particlesleads to a slight modification <strong>of</strong> the Ni columnsorientation and size. On the other hand, thecodeposition <strong>of</strong> SiC nano-particles leads to theformation <strong>of</strong> a fine grained deposit in which the Nicolumns are not oriented. The addition <strong>of</strong> microparticlesleads to a microstructure columnar with aslight modification <strong>of</strong> orientation, caused probablyc)13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13 49

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!