11.07.2015 Views

Proceedings of SerbiaTrib '13

Proceedings of SerbiaTrib '13

Proceedings of SerbiaTrib '13

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

M fr / T [-]10.90.80.70.60.50.40.30.20.10t 0=t pt=5.5 st ps'=11.5 st st=21.05 st 1=26.05 s0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 1820 22 24 26 28 30 32t [s]Figure 29. Ratio M fr /T: CWT, n=910 rpm, d 0 =0 mmMeasured values <strong>of</strong> torque and forces were usedfor calculating values <strong>of</strong> the friction coefficient andratio <strong>of</strong> momentum <strong>of</strong> friction and the torque(Figure 6 to Figure 29).6. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONSThe first set <strong>of</strong> experiments with the“theoretical” welding tool has shown that weldingtool without thread at the probe can not be used forwelding <strong>of</strong> 2024 T351 alloy. Plunging <strong>of</strong> thewelding tool into workpieces was possible onlywhen diameter <strong>of</strong> the welding tool was the same asthe diameter <strong>of</strong> the technological hole in theworkpieces. During such experiment, appeared thatfriction coefficient, after initial stabilization,reaches almost constant value between 0.3 to 0.4what is prescribed value for the FSW <strong>of</strong> AL 2024T351 and the “theoretical” welding tool [1]. Theratio <strong>of</strong> momentum <strong>of</strong> friction and the appliedtorque has a value <strong>of</strong> 1 – there is no (or hasminimal) deformation in the contact.The conclusion was that the plunging <strong>of</strong> the“theoretical” welding tool in welding plates wasimpossible when small or no technological holepresent what implies that welding couldn't even getstarted.The second set <strong>of</strong> experiments was conductedwith the coned, threaded welding tool with theprescribed technological parameters. Welding waspossible, however, only welding with n=910 rpmhas given the qualitative welds. During allweldings, trends and values <strong>of</strong> the frictioncoefficient were identical. Friction coefficient wasrising from the beginning <strong>of</strong> the plunging until themoment <strong>of</strong> time when the shoulder tip involves inthe welding. Common values <strong>of</strong> maximal frictioncoefficient reach about 1 but it is not uncommon toreach values <strong>of</strong> 2-5 (what is in correspondence withthe literature-present values [1-4] but it is possibleto have peak values as imperfections <strong>of</strong> theproposed method for estimation). From thatmoment, friction coefficient drops down and at thebeginning <strong>of</strong> the first dwelling phase reaches value<strong>of</strong> about 0.2 to 0.7. However, at the end <strong>of</strong> thedwelling phase, friction coefficient in allexperiments reaches the values <strong>of</strong> 0.2 to 0.5.The ratio between the momentum <strong>of</strong> friction andthe applied torque has the same trend for allexperiments. It rises up to the maximal value <strong>of</strong> 1and varies from 0.8 to 1, during every conductedexperiment. The results are in agreement with theexisting results [2, 3, 4].LITERATURE[1] Mijajlović, M., Investigation and Development <strong>of</strong>Analytical Model for Estimation <strong>of</strong> Amount <strong>of</strong> HeatGenerated During FSW (in Serbian), Ph. D. thesis,Faculty <strong>of</strong> Mechanical Engineering Nis, University<strong>of</strong> Nis, Nis, Serbia, 2012.[2] V. Soundararajan, M. Valant, R. Kovačević: AnOverview <strong>of</strong> R&D Work in Friction Stir Welding atSMU, MJoM, Metalurgija – Journal <strong>of</strong> Metallurgy,Association <strong>of</strong> Metallurgical Engineers <strong>of</strong> Serbia,204, 12, pp. 277-295, 2006.[3] M. Djurdjanović, M. Mijajlović, D. Milčić, D.Stamenković: Heat Generation During Friction StirWelding Process, Tribology in Industry, 1-2, pp. 8-14, 2009.[4] K. Kumar, C. Kalyan, S.V. Kailasa, T.S. Srivatsan:An Investigation <strong>of</strong> Friction during Friction StirWelding <strong>of</strong> Metallic Materials, Materials andManufacturing Processes, 24, pp. 438-445, 2009.[5] M. Mijajlović, D. Stamenković, D. Milčić,M. Đurdanović: Study About Friction CoefficientEstimation in Friction Stir Welding, Balkantrib 11,The 7th International Conference on Tribology,<strong>Proceedings</strong>, Thessaloniki, Greece, pp. 323-330,2011.[6] M. Mijajlović, D. Milčić, B. Anđelković,M. Vukićević, M. Bjelić: Mathematical Model forAnalytical Estimation <strong>of</strong> Generated Heat DuringFriction Stir Welding. Part 1, Journal <strong>of</strong> BalkanTribological Association, 17, pp. 179-191, 2011.[7] P. Ulysse: Three-Dimensional Modeling <strong>of</strong> theFriction Stir-Welding Process, Int. J. Mach. Tool.Manu. 42, pp.1549-1557, 2002.[8] H. Schmidt, J. Hattel, J. Wert: An Analytical Modelfor the Heat Generation in Friction Stir Welding,Modeling Simul. Mater. Sci. Eng. 12,pp. 143-157, 2004.[9] M. Mijajlović, D. Milčić, B. Anđelković,M. Vukićević, M. Bjelić: Mathematical Model forAnalytical Estimation <strong>of</strong> Generated Heat DuringFriction Stir Welding. Part 2, Journal <strong>of</strong> BalkanTribological Association, 17, pp. 361-370, 2011.13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13 395

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!