16.08.2012 Views

Engineering

Engineering

Engineering

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

3.6 Consolidated financial statements Notes to the consolidated financial statements<br />

interest level this approach is also maintained for the current analysis.<br />

The analysis results in the opportunities (positive values) and risks<br />

(negative values) shown in the following table:<br />

million €<br />

Changes in all yield curves<br />

as of Sept. 30, 2011 by<br />

+ 100 basis<br />

points<br />

(20) basis<br />

points<br />

Cash flow risk 26 (5)<br />

Opportunity effects<br />

Interest rate risks resulting from interest rate<br />

164 (34)<br />

derivatives affecting balance sheet<br />

Interest rate risks resulting from interest rate<br />

(1) 0<br />

derivatives affecting earnings 0 0<br />

In the previous year the analysis resulted in the opportunities (positive<br />

values) and risks (negative values) shown in the following table:<br />

million €<br />

Changes in all yield curves<br />

as of Sept. 30, 2010 by<br />

+ 100 basis<br />

points<br />

(20) basis<br />

points<br />

Cash flow risk 27 (5)<br />

Opportunity effects<br />

Interest rate risks resulting from interest rate<br />

203 (42)<br />

derivatives affecting balance sheet<br />

Interest rate risks resulting from interest rate<br />

2 0<br />

derivatives affecting earnings 0 0<br />

If, as of September 30, 2011, all yield curves combined had been 100<br />

basis points higher, the hedge reserve in equity and fair value of the<br />

relevant interest derivatives would have been €1 million lower (2010:<br />

€2 million higher) and earnings resulting from the measurement as of<br />

the balance sheet date €26 million (2009/2010: €27 million) higher. If,<br />

as of September 30, 2011, all yield curves combined had been 20<br />

basis points lower, the hedge reserve in equity and fair value of the<br />

relevant interest derivatives would have been unchanged as in the<br />

previous year and earnings resulting from the measurement as of the<br />

balance sheet date €5 million (2009/2010: €5 million) lower.<br />

Commodity price risks<br />

The Group uses various nonferrous metals, especially nickel, as well as<br />

commodities such as ore, coal, coke and energy, for different<br />

production processes. Purchase prices for commodities and energy<br />

can vary significantly depending on market conditions.<br />

Consolidated financial statements<br />

184 | 185<br />

This causes commodity price risks which can affect income, equity and<br />

cash flow. We react with adjusted selling prices and alternative<br />

purchasing resources to ensure our competitiveness. To minimize risks<br />

arising from commodity price volatilities, the Group also uses<br />

derivatives, especially for nickel and copper. The contracting of such<br />

financial derivatives is subject to strict guidelines which are checked for<br />

compliance by internal auditing. The nonferrous metals are generally<br />

hedged by a central system. Only marketable instruments are used, as<br />

there are mainly commodity forward contracts. Commodity forward<br />

contracts are measured at fair value. Fluctuations in fair value are<br />

recognized predominately in profit or loss under sales revenue or cost<br />

of sales. Sometimes cash flow hedge accounting is used when<br />

commodity derivatives are immediately and directly allocated to a<br />

particular firm commitment. In some cases, fair value hedges are used<br />

to hedge the exposure to changes in fair value of a firm commitment<br />

and exposure to inventory price risks.<br />

Risks resulting from rising energy prices are limited by structuring<br />

procurement on the electricity market and concluding or extending<br />

long-term natural gas contracts. These contracts are subject to the socalled<br />

“own use exemption” and therefore not carried as derivatives.<br />

Only hypothetical changes in market prices for derivatives are included<br />

in scenario analysis, required for financial instruments under IFRS 7.<br />

Offsetting effects from underlying transactions are not taken into<br />

account and would reduce their effect significantly.<br />

As of September 30, 2011 a +20/(20)% shift in market prices for<br />

commodities is assumed. The prior year assumptions of market prices<br />

at production cost level of important manufacturers respectively<br />

historical peak market prices have been replaced by this shift in market<br />

prices which seems to be more probable. If an increase of 20%<br />

(2009/2010: 142%) in market prices for said commodities is assumed,<br />

the estimated hypothetical impact on profit or loss resulting from the<br />

measurement as of the balance sheet date is 0 (2009/2010: €(200)<br />

million), and on equity €(9) million (2010: €113 million). If a decrease<br />

of 20% (2009/2010: 78%) in market prices for said commodities is<br />

assumed, the estimated hypothetical impact on profit or loss resulting<br />

from the measurement as of the balance sheet date is €65 million<br />

(2009/2010: €142 million), and on equity €(46) million (2010: €(50)<br />

million).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!