Engineering
Engineering
Engineering
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
1.3 To our shareholders shareholders Corporate governance report<br />
Zero tolerance of of antitrust violations and and<br />
corruption is is the core of of our our Compliance<br />
Commitment.<br />
Page 117<br />
www.thyssenkrupp.com<br />
The Executive Board of ThyssenKrupp AG has unequivocally expressed its rejection of antitrust violations<br />
and corruption in the ThyssenKrupp Compliance Commitment. Antitrust violations and corruption are not<br />
tolerated in any way and result in sanctions against the employees concerned. All employees are requested<br />
to cooperate actively in their areas of responsibility in implementing the compliance program. The<br />
Compliance Commitment is supplemented by various Group policy statements and publications. In these,<br />
the underlying statutory requirements are explained in more detail. The key messages of our compliance<br />
policies and guidance notes are summarized in a Compliance Code of Conduct.<br />
A compliance unit has been set up to develop, manage and implement the program. For example, full-time<br />
compliance officers inform employees about the relevant statutory provisions and internal policies in regular<br />
training sessions. They are also available to answer individual questions. As an additional compliance<br />
element, ThyssenKrupp has introduced a whistleblower hotline. It is run for us by an external law firm. The<br />
whistleblower hotline is available to employees of the Group and third parties to report possible<br />
infringements of laws or policies at Group companies. Here too the focus is on antitrust and anti-corruption<br />
compliance. The hotline can be contacted from anywhere in the world and is toll-free.<br />
In May 2011 the Bochum public prosecutor’s office and the Federal Cartel Office instigated investigations<br />
into antitrust violations in connection with the so-called “rail cartel”. The matter involves allegations of anticompetitive<br />
agreements in sections of the rail business in Germany. Within the ThyssenKrupp Group, the<br />
investigations concern ThyssenKrupp GfT Gleistechnik GmbH and several employees. More information is<br />
provided in the risk report in the section “Expected developments and associated opportunities and risks” .<br />
Objectives of the Supervisory Board with regard to the composition of corporate bodies<br />
In appointing Executive Board members and determining the composition of the Supervisory Board, the<br />
Executive Committee, Nomination Committee and Supervisory Board of ThyssenKrupp AG aim to maintain a<br />
balanced mix of specialist qualifications and also take into account the criterion of diversity. On September<br />
03, 2010 concrete objectives were established for the future composition of the Supervisory Board. These<br />
objectives were published in the corporate governance report in the 2009/2010 Annual Report, which is<br />
accessible on the internet at www.thyssenkrupp.com/financial-reports/09_10/en/governance.html. These<br />
objectives are not limited to the issue of female representation but reflect further criteria to ensure the<br />
heterogeneous composition of the Supervisory Board – including an international background, suitable<br />
specialist knowledge, technical expertise, knowledge of the Company and not least independence. The<br />
Supervisory Board’s proposals for the election of Supervisory Board members should continue to be based<br />
on the welfare of the Company while giving consideration to these objectives.<br />
This was also the basis on which the election proposal submitted to the Annual General Meeting on January<br />
21, 2011 was prepared. The Nomination Committee and the full Supervisory Board discussed and<br />
subsequently adopted the proposal of the Alfried Krupp von Bohlen und Halbach Foundation to elect Prof.<br />
Dr.-Ing. Schulz to the Supervisory Board as a shareholder representative. Both bodies consider the election<br />
of Prof. Dr.-Ing. Schulz appropriate in particular in view of his knowledge of the Company and his technical<br />
expertise.<br />
30