12.07.2015 Views

A Critical Conversation on Climate Change ... - Green Choices

A Critical Conversation on Climate Change ... - Green Choices

A Critical Conversation on Climate Change ... - Green Choices

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

less<strong>on</strong>s unlearned 125And probably you w<strong>on</strong>’t be surprised to learn that there are still furtherpolitical difficulties with that project.C<strong>on</strong>flicts over ownershipA basic requirement of any trading system is that everybody has toagree who the owners are of the goods to be traded. For a car marketto work, for example, everybody has to agree that it is the car companythat owns the product to be sold – not auto workers, nor communitiesnear sources of raw materials, nor any<strong>on</strong>e else. In emissi<strong>on</strong>smarkets, however, not every<strong>on</strong>e agrees who owns what. Many peopleclaim that countries or firms are using polluti<strong>on</strong> dump space that bel<strong>on</strong>gsto others.The problem was already evident in the US’s sulphur dioxide tradingsystem, which granted polluti<strong>on</strong> allowances <strong>on</strong>ly to the biggestpollutingprivate firms. Some envir<strong>on</strong>mentalists argued that it waselectricity customers, not power companies, who should get the allowances,and that companies should have to buy them. ‘It’s the public’sair that’s being used as a waste dump,’ observed attorney DavidD<strong>on</strong>iger of Envir<strong>on</strong>mental Defence in 2002. ‘There’s a good argumentthat you ought to pay to use the dump.’ 220Even deeper and more wide-ranging difficulties about ownershipaffl ict the Kyoto Protocol and the EU Emissi<strong>on</strong>s Trading Scheme.As ec<strong>on</strong>omist Sim<strong>on</strong>e Bastian<strong>on</strong>i and colleagues observe, such programmesrequire an ‘accounting method to create a greenhouse gasinventory which also assigns resp<strong>on</strong>sibility for emissi<strong>on</strong>s’. 221 To put itmore briefly: emissi<strong>on</strong>s markets need to know who it is exactly that’swarming the globe.Sounds like an easy questi<strong>on</strong>.It’s not. It’s a little like trying to work out in the courts who is resp<strong>on</strong>siblefor an industrial accident that takes off a worker’s finger. Is it theco-worker who wasn’t watching? The manufacturer of the machinery?The c<strong>on</strong>tractor who operates it? The pers<strong>on</strong> who invented it 50 yearsago? The owner of the company hiring the c<strong>on</strong>tractor? The owner ofthe factory site? The government safety board? The worker herself?Similarly, who’s resp<strong>on</strong>sible for the burning of fossil fuels in the petroltank of a particular car? The car owner who drives it? Exx<strong>on</strong>, whodrilled the oil? General Motors, who built the car? The politician whodefeated the mass transportati<strong>on</strong> system that would have made the car’spurchase unnecessary? The government of the country within whoseborders the car is driven? Should countries be held resp<strong>on</strong>sible for their

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!