12.07.2015 Views

A Critical Conversation on Climate Change ... - Green Choices

A Critical Conversation on Climate Change ... - Green Choices

A Critical Conversation on Climate Change ... - Green Choices

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

‘made in the usa’ – a short history of carb<strong>on</strong> trading 63Three in <strong>on</strong>eThis chapter has suggested that a market fix, a technological fix and aknowledge fix have come to be intertwined in climate change politicsin an intimate way.The recent US neoliberal innovati<strong>on</strong> known as the polluti<strong>on</strong> market,growing largely out of academic theory, NGO advocacy and an antiregulati<strong>on</strong>backlash am<strong>on</strong>g corporati<strong>on</strong>s, moved with startling speedinto internati<strong>on</strong>al climate politics in the 1990s. Fed by a corporatefriendlyreading of climate science and ec<strong>on</strong>omics, as well as researchinto technological fixes, it drew UN agencies and activists alike intoits gravitati<strong>on</strong>al field, eventually triumphing over early Southern andEuropean oppositi<strong>on</strong> through complex and still partly obscure politicalprocesses. An ast<strong>on</strong>ishing range of instituti<strong>on</strong>s from private companiesto UN agencies, university departments and NGOs are nowaligned around an agenda characterised by rejecti<strong>on</strong> of precauti<strong>on</strong>,inability to come to terms with indeterminacy and irreversibility, insistencethat tradeoffs are always possible, and support for growth incorporate power.The market fix, the technological fix and the knowledge fix havecome together to encase internati<strong>on</strong>al climate politics in a debate inwhich almost the <strong>on</strong>ly questi<strong>on</strong>s spoken are the narrow <strong>on</strong>es largecorporati<strong>on</strong>s most want to hear. Is there or is there not human-causedclimate change? If there is, what might make c<strong>on</strong>tinued fossil fuel usepossible? How can more subsidies be channelled to technologies corporati<strong>on</strong>scan profit from? How can privatisati<strong>on</strong> and ‘efficiency’ befurthered in a way most acceptable to the public? Such questi<strong>on</strong>s areuniting the most cynical corporate hack and the most innocent envir<strong>on</strong>mentalactivist in a single agenda. The c<strong>on</strong>sequences of bypassingthe central issues of fossil fuel overuse, ownership, corporate power,free enquiry and democracy will be explored in the next chapter.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!