12.07.2015 Views

A Critical Conversation on Climate Change ... - Green Choices

A Critical Conversation on Climate Change ... - Green Choices

A Critical Conversation on Climate Change ... - Green Choices

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

less<strong>on</strong>s unlearned 89Table 2. Quasi-Privatisati<strong>on</strong> of the Existing Global Carb<strong>on</strong> Dump by the UKNati<strong>on</strong>al Yearly Allocati<strong>on</strong> under the EU Emissi<strong>on</strong>s Trading Scheme, 2005Industrial Sector(UK Only)Annual Gift ofEmissi<strong>on</strong>s Rights(Milli<strong>on</strong> T<strong>on</strong>nesof CO 2 )Increase/Decreasefrom ActualAverageEmissi<strong>on</strong>s1998–2003Fracti<strong>on</strong> of‘Available’World AbovegroundCarb<strong>on</strong>Dump aApprox.AnnualValue at€16/t<strong>on</strong>neof CO 2bPower Generators 145.3 -6% 1.5-3.0% €2.325bIr<strong>on</strong> and Steel 23.3 +16% 0.2-0.5% 373mRefineries 19.8 +11% 0.2-0.4% 317mOffshore Oil and Gas 19.1 +14% 0.2-0.4% 306mCement 10.7 +18% 0.1-0.2% 171mChemicals 10.1 +12% 0.1-0.2% 162mPulp and Paper 4.7 +18% 0.0-0.1% 75mFood and Drink 3.9 +26% 0.0-0.1% 62mOther Industries 15.1 +16% 0.2-0.3% 242mTotal 252.0 +2% 2.6-5.1% €4.032baFigures in this column are not based <strong>on</strong> any attempt to estimate the earth’s capacity torecycle transfers of fossil carb<strong>on</strong> with no remainder, which, even if initial assumpti<strong>on</strong>scould be agreed <strong>on</strong>, would probably be impossible in technical terms. Rather, they take asa point of reference the Intergovernmental Panel <strong>on</strong> <strong>Climate</strong> <strong>Change</strong> finding that anthropogenicCO 2 emissi<strong>on</strong>s from fossil fuel combusti<strong>on</strong> and flaring must be reduced by 60–80per cent from current levels of 24,533 milli<strong>on</strong> metric t<strong>on</strong>nes/year to achieve eventual stabilizati<strong>on</strong>of CO 2 levels at twice Industrial Revoluti<strong>on</strong> levels.bApproximate price in early June 2006. For every t<strong>on</strong>ne of uncompensated-for CO 2 emittedabove the limit, companies face a fine of €40, rising to €100 from 2008 <strong>on</strong>wards. Columnsmay not add up due to rounding.Sources: UK Department of Envir<strong>on</strong>ment, Food and Rural Affairs, Carb<strong>on</strong> Market News.But if emissi<strong>on</strong>s caps are ever tightened, companies will need either to makereducti<strong>on</strong>s or to pay up, w<strong>on</strong>’t they? And surely eventually it is the biggest polluterswho will lose out at that point, no?Yes, many corporati<strong>on</strong>s are so<strong>on</strong>er or later probably going to have togive something up. But emissi<strong>on</strong>s trading encourages them to treatglobal warming not as a social and envir<strong>on</strong>mental problem to besolved but as a business and public relati<strong>on</strong>s problem to be kept out ofordinary people’s hands and to be managed at the least possible relativefinancial and market loss to themselves. And it gives them themeans to make sure caps are not tightened very much or very swiftly.Far-sighted companies treat the carb<strong>on</strong> trading as an opportunity togain new property rights, assets and openings for capital accumulati<strong>on</strong>,even if climate change is accelerated in the process.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!