12.07.2015 Views

A Critical Conversation on Climate Change ... - Green Choices

A Critical Conversation on Climate Change ... - Green Choices

A Critical Conversation on Climate Change ... - Green Choices

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

less<strong>on</strong>s unlearned 167Ownership againI thought we already talked about this.No, our previous discussi<strong>on</strong> was about the difficulties created bythe need of emissi<strong>on</strong>s trading to create and distribute property rights.Carb<strong>on</strong> - saving projects such as those created under the Clean DevelopmentMechanism raise property rights problems of their own. Asthe next chapter will document, the new carb<strong>on</strong> dumps that largepolluters need usually have to appropriate some<strong>on</strong>e else’s land, some<strong>on</strong>eelse’s water, or some<strong>on</strong>e else’s future. C<strong>on</strong>fl icts over ownershipare inevitable.Some of the easiest examples are carb<strong>on</strong> projects that involve treeplanting.Jayant Sathaye of the US’s Lawrence Berkeley Nati<strong>on</strong>al Laboratory<strong>on</strong>ce observed breezily that anxieties about the rich cleansing theiremissi<strong>on</strong>s by taking over the poor’s land for forestry projects couldbe relieved simply by ‘ensuring that the title to the land is separatedfrom the title to carb<strong>on</strong>.’ 379 The reality is not so simple. First, mostplantati<strong>on</strong>s that are candidates for carb<strong>on</strong> finance are already in thehands of powerful corporati<strong>on</strong>s or state bureaucracies. Many of thesecorporati<strong>on</strong>s or bureaucracies are already embroiled in c<strong>on</strong>fl ict withlocal people over their takeover of local land and water. In such circumstancescarb<strong>on</strong> finance is likely to be viewed merely as anothersubsidy for an exploitative status quo. Sec<strong>on</strong>d, land whose tree andsoil carb<strong>on</strong> has been signed over to a utility is going to be less able toprovide livelihood goods to local people. 380Carb<strong>on</strong> is not some unexploited ‘extra’ product that is simply lyingaround unused, waiting to be plucked and sold to fossil fuel users,with no other social effects. Its presence is intimately bound up withother uses of the land. Since, under the CDM, the land in questi<strong>on</strong>lies in the South, carb<strong>on</strong> plantati<strong>on</strong> projects are likely to magnify existingNorth-South inequalities.The case of bioenergy plantati<strong>on</strong>s presents an interesting case study.Bioenergy schemes are increasingly attracting carb<strong>on</strong> finance (includingover 100 projects registered with the CDM by May 2006).Insofar as they are expected to replace a substantial percentage of theoil or coal used in today’s industry and transport systems, however,they foreshadow a future in which vast tracts of land in the South areturned over to producing biofuel for export.That raises the questi<strong>on</strong> of whether such plantati<strong>on</strong>s would be anymore successful for the countries that establish them than traditi<strong>on</strong>alagricultural export m<strong>on</strong>ocultures, given familiar problems of

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!