12.07.2015 Views

A Critical Conversation on Climate Change ... - Green Choices

A Critical Conversation on Climate Change ... - Green Choices

A Critical Conversation on Climate Change ... - Green Choices

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

less<strong>on</strong>s unlearned 77It’s not so simple. Just because something is temporary doesn’t meanit’s not a property right.Property rights come in many shapes and sizes (see box: ‘Sir HenryMaine and the Right to Pollute’, opposite). A lot of property rightsare temporary. Think of m<strong>on</strong>thly or yearly leases. Think of mining,logging or grazing c<strong>on</strong>cessi<strong>on</strong>s that governments give out to corporati<strong>on</strong>sfor 30 years or 75 years. Think of copyrights, trademarks, andlicenses. Think of fishing quotas or seed, gene or drug patents, all ofwhich expire after a certain length of time.All of these temporary property rights have been used to privatise orenclose various goods. All have been used to make billi<strong>on</strong>s for privatecompanies. And all have been used to transfer wealth and power tothe rich, sometimes igniting bitter c<strong>on</strong>fl ict over democracy and howhuman beings’ envir<strong>on</strong>ments are to be treated.Emissi<strong>on</strong>s allowances are no different. Industry, ec<strong>on</strong>omists, governmentsand legal scholars all agree that, in giving away these allowances,emissi<strong>on</strong>s trading schemes do give away something quite substantial.As the Internati<strong>on</strong>al Accounting Standards Board notes with regardto the EU ETS, allowances are ‘assets…owned by the company c<strong>on</strong>cerned…andas such represent a significant and immediate creati<strong>on</strong>of value to companies’. They should be seen as a ‘government grant,and accounted for as such, i.e. treated as deferred income in the balancesheet and recognised as income <strong>on</strong> a systematic basis’. 20 Temporaryor not, emissi<strong>on</strong>s permits c<strong>on</strong>stitute a ‘major input factor toproducti<strong>on</strong>.’ 21Allowances aren’t valuable just because they enable polluters to avoidhaving to spend m<strong>on</strong>ey <strong>on</strong> polluti<strong>on</strong> c<strong>on</strong>trol. They also enable corporati<strong>on</strong>sto borrow m<strong>on</strong>ey more easily and give them a better shareprice. And they set a precedent for granting them further entitlements.They can also be bought and sold for clear profit. They havemarket value. It matters who they are given to.I still d<strong>on</strong>’t understand. How can you have rights over something as intangibleas the earth’s carb<strong>on</strong>-cycling capacity?Companies have legal rights over all sorts of intangible things. Drugcompanies own genes. The Disney Company owns the Winnie-the-Pooh story. General Electric and Rupert Murdoch hold temporaryrights over parts of the broadcast spectrum – rights that they are nowtrying to make permanent. 22 Other companies own new ideas fortheir producti<strong>on</strong> lines.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!