12.07.2015 Views

A Critical Conversation on Climate Change ... - Green Choices

A Critical Conversation on Climate Change ... - Green Choices

A Critical Conversation on Climate Change ... - Green Choices

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

introducti<strong>on</strong> – a new fossil fuel crisis 19The Birth of Atmospheric RightsUp to now, philosopher Peter Singer writes,it is as if the world’s people have been living‘in a village in which every<strong>on</strong>e puts theirwastes down a giant sink’. At first there isno problem:‘No <strong>on</strong>e quite knows what happens tothe wastes after they go down the sink,but since they disappear and have no adverseimpact <strong>on</strong> any<strong>on</strong>e, no <strong>on</strong>e worriesabout it. Some people c<strong>on</strong>sume a lot, andso have a lot of waste, while others, withmore limited means, have barely any, butthe capacity of the sinks to dispose of ourwastes seems so limitless that no <strong>on</strong>e worriesabout the difference.’ 65 No matter howmuch of the sink <strong>on</strong>e pers<strong>on</strong> may use, noproblems arise, because there is alwaysenough for everybody else.But after a while,‘…the sink’s capacity to carry away ourwastes is used up to the full, and there isalready some unpleasant seepage that seemsto be the result of the sink’s being usedtoo much… When the weather is warm, itsmells. A nearby water hole where our childrenswim now has algae blooms that makeit unusable. Several respected figures in thevillage warn that unless usage of the sink iscut down, all the village water supplies willbe polluted.’C<strong>on</strong>tinuing to throw wastes down thesink, in other words, does not leave enoughof it for every<strong>on</strong>e to use without harm tothe community.‘What we might have assumed was our defacto right to use the sink any way we wantedcomes into questi<strong>on</strong>. The sink bel<strong>on</strong>gsto us all in comm<strong>on</strong>. In order to avoidc<strong>on</strong>sequences no <strong>on</strong>e wants, every<strong>on</strong>ewho uses it must now accept some limits.’Atmospheric rights, Singer believes, mustnow be discussed, defined, limited and allocated.66Whew. Sounds complicated.It is. That’s why the sec<strong>on</strong>d and third chapters of this special report ofDevelopment Dialogue are reserved partly for a look at how this politicshas developed.OK, I’ll wait for that. But right now can’t you at least give me some idea ofthe political status quo? Who has been using the most dump space so far? Whois most resp<strong>on</strong>sible for the current climate crisis?As menti<strong>on</strong>ed at the beginning of this chapter, the North is overwhelminglyresp<strong>on</strong>sible. Andrew Simms of the New Ec<strong>on</strong>omicsFoundati<strong>on</strong> perhaps sums up the situati<strong>on</strong> best: ‘Ec<strong>on</strong>omic superpowershave been as successful today in their disproporti<strong>on</strong>ate occupati<strong>on</strong>of the atmosphere with carb<strong>on</strong> emissi<strong>on</strong>s as they were in theirmilitary occupati<strong>on</strong> of the terrestrial world in col<strong>on</strong>ial times.’ 67From 1950 to 1986, the US, with less than 5 per cent of the world’spopulati<strong>on</strong>, was resp<strong>on</strong>sible for 30 per cent of its cumulative greenhouse

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!