12.07.2015 Views

A Critical Conversation on Climate Change ... - Green Choices

A Critical Conversation on Climate Change ... - Green Choices

A Critical Conversation on Climate Change ... - Green Choices

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

less<strong>on</strong>s unlearned 177Innovati<strong>on</strong>, the Atmosphere and Ec<strong>on</strong>omicsBecause it allows the North to delayurgently-needed social and technologicalchange, every block of carb<strong>on</strong> credits fromthe South has a l<strong>on</strong>g-term climatic cost.Carb<strong>on</strong> accountants need to quantify such‘opportunity costs’ when adding up theeffects <strong>on</strong> the atmosphere of each carb<strong>on</strong>project. Logically speaking, that’s a prerequisitefor accurately calculating howmany carb<strong>on</strong> credits a project should beallowed to sell.However, no CDM project validators orverifiers ever make such calculati<strong>on</strong>s. No<strong>on</strong>e has any idea how to figure out howmuch carb<strong>on</strong> a project will ‘lose’ by deprivinga company in the North of an immediateincentive to innovate. Nor is it possiblethey ever will, although in the l<strong>on</strong>g termthe amount could be enormous.This failure of the carb<strong>on</strong> ‘offset’ market is<strong>on</strong>ly <strong>on</strong>e example of the many paradoxeswhich result when c<strong>on</strong>venti<strong>on</strong>al ec<strong>on</strong>omicthinking is uncritically applied to issuessuch as climate change mitigati<strong>on</strong>. As legalscholar Robin Paul Malloy explains, efficiencyanalysis ‘is incapable of adequatelyaddressing creativity because creativity isindeterminate.’ 404the private sector not to make renewable energy targets too stringent,for fear future CDM projects will not be able to prove they are betterthan what would have happened otherwise. 406Pressures for holding off <strong>on</strong> innovati<strong>on</strong> are increased by the fact thatcredit buyers and c<strong>on</strong>sultant validators seeking future c<strong>on</strong>tracts haveincentives to postulate, and try to bring about, business-as-usual scenarioswhich are the highest-emitting possible, in order to make theprojects that they back appear to be saving as much carb<strong>on</strong> as possible.Sec<strong>on</strong>d, some proposed CDM projects claim carb<strong>on</strong> credits simply forobeying the envir<strong>on</strong>mental laws of the host country. One example is aproposed project to divert the natural gas now being flared into the skyby Chevr<strong>on</strong>, Shell and other corporati<strong>on</strong>s in Nigeria to a productiveuse. Flaring is already prohibited in Nigeria, and the companies havebeen paying a penalty for n<strong>on</strong>-compliance. 408 Indeed, the NigerianHigh Court recently affirmed that flaring is illegal and unc<strong>on</strong>stituti<strong>on</strong>al.409 Another example is South African regulati<strong>on</strong>s that methane emissi<strong>on</strong>sfrom landfills be captured <strong>on</strong>ce they reach a certain level. 410Prop<strong>on</strong>ents of carb<strong>on</strong> projects often claim that they help ensure thatenvir<strong>on</strong>mental laws are obeyed. However, the prospect of carb<strong>on</strong> financegives both host countries and project prop<strong>on</strong>ents incentives forensuring that those laws – including those that create incentives forstructural change and innovati<strong>on</strong> to lower emissi<strong>on</strong>s – are normally

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!