12.07.2015 Views

A Critical Conversation on Climate Change ... - Green Choices

A Critical Conversation on Climate Change ... - Green Choices

A Critical Conversation on Climate Change ... - Green Choices

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

less<strong>on</strong>s unlearned 139Still other dump extensi<strong>on</strong>s c<strong>on</strong>sist of new trees planted to absorbcarb<strong>on</strong> dioxide 260 or soils where tilling has been halted to allow carb<strong>on</strong>buildup, or stretches of ocean salted with ir<strong>on</strong> to stimulate plantgrowth.Gas flaring. Companiesmay so<strong>on</strong> be able toget carb<strong>on</strong> credits forusing the gas to generateelectricity instead.And the sec<strong>on</strong>d type of dump extensi<strong>on</strong>?A sec<strong>on</strong>d type involves various emissi<strong>on</strong>s-saving technologies. For example,companies wanting carb<strong>on</strong> credits can help refit factories inKorea or India to capture or destroy hydroflourocarb<strong>on</strong>s such as HFC-23 or other powerful greenhouse gases such as nitrous oxide. Or theycan invest in hydroelectric dams in Guatemala or Brazil that ‘replace’electricity generated by fossil fuels. Or they can set up wind farms togenerate green electricity, or institute efficiency projects that distributeenergy-frugal light bulbs or rearrange traffic signals. Or they can growbiofuel plantati<strong>on</strong>s, which are claimed to provide ‘substitutes’ for fossilfuels. Or they can start up a project to feed supplements to Ugandancows to reduce their methane flatulence. 261 They might even try gettingcredits for cleaning up debris left by the Indian Ocean tsunami. 262Another target for carb<strong>on</strong> finance is projects that take methane from,say, waste dumps in South Africa, coal seams in China, pig farms inChile, 263 or fl aring towers in Nigerian oil fields, and use it as a fuel forgenerating electricity. Many such projects release carb<strong>on</strong> dioxide, butare said to be relatively ‘good’ for the climate, since releases of unburnedmethane are even worse for the climate than carb<strong>on</strong> dioxide.But wait a minute. Shouldn’t it just be things like energy effi ciency measuresor solar power – or not building a plant at all – that get carb<strong>on</strong> m<strong>on</strong>ey? Aren’tthose things all less carb<strong>on</strong>-intensive than methane combusti<strong>on</strong>?It doesn’t matter. As l<strong>on</strong>g as a project emits less greenhouse gas than‘business as usual’, it’s in the m<strong>on</strong>ey.But who fi gures out what ‘business as usual’ is?The project prop<strong>on</strong>ent’s private c<strong>on</strong>sultants.Who gives them the power to decide what is business as usual?The UN does. Private businesses do. Government officials do. Individualswho buy carb<strong>on</strong> ‘offset’ credits do.Some of these private c<strong>on</strong>sultants have also served <strong>on</strong> intergovernmentalpanels providing technical advice to the UN <strong>on</strong> what can bed<strong>on</strong>e about climate change and the carb<strong>on</strong> accounting methods thatshould be used for carb<strong>on</strong> projects. 264 That further increases their influencewith governments, industry and the UN.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!