12.07.2015 Views

A Critical Conversation on Climate Change ... - Green Choices

A Critical Conversation on Climate Change ... - Green Choices

A Critical Conversation on Climate Change ... - Green Choices

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

less<strong>on</strong>s unlearned 153Sinks, biophysics and the unknownSome of the worst trouble that carb<strong>on</strong> market planners have landedthemselves in has come about as a result of credit-generating schemesthat purportedly soak up carb<strong>on</strong> dioxide through tree-planting orother biotic means. There are even more verificati<strong>on</strong> problems withthese ‘carb<strong>on</strong> sink’ projects than with other ‘offsets.’D<strong>on</strong>’t tell me. How could things be any worse?From the beginning, climate technocrats have been under heavy pressureto try to operate a ‘system of credits and debits wherein emissi<strong>on</strong>or sequestrati<strong>on</strong> of carb<strong>on</strong> in the biosphere is equated with emissi<strong>on</strong>of carb<strong>on</strong> from fossil fuels’. 311 They’ve been pushed into trying toprove that a world which closes a certain number of coal mines or oilwells will be climatically equivalent to <strong>on</strong>e which keeps them openbut plants more trees, ploughs less soil, fertilises oceans with ir<strong>on</strong>,and so forth.So the idea is that if you plant enough trees, you can go <strong>on</strong> mining and burningfossil fuels forever.Well, not exactly. Even the biggest fans of tree ‘offset’ projects admitthat there’s not actually much scope for using tree-planting to dealwith the climate crisis.As Chapter 1 noted, the pool of carb<strong>on</strong> stored in living biomass isdwarfed by the pool of remaining fossil carb<strong>on</strong> awaiting exploitati<strong>on</strong>.Under the most favourable assumpti<strong>on</strong>s, using trees even to try to‘compensate’ for current emissi<strong>on</strong>s would require protecting impossiblec<strong>on</strong>tinent-sized plantati<strong>on</strong>s rigorously for decades. 312 Trying tocounteract a single year’s emissi<strong>on</strong>s in the UK would necessitate coveringDev<strong>on</strong> and Cornwall with trees. 313 Doing the same for a singleyear’s global emissi<strong>on</strong>s would mean, at a minimum, setting up andprotecting industrial plantati<strong>on</strong>s <strong>on</strong> all ‘available’ land in Brazil forthe next 40 to 50 years. 314 Attempting to absorb the carb<strong>on</strong> dioxidereleased by the burning of the fossil fuels still in the ground wouldrequire additi<strong>on</strong>al planets full of trees. As a distinguished group ofscientists writing in Science c<strong>on</strong>cluded:Prospects of retrieving anthropogenic CO 2 from the atmosphereby enhancing natural sinks are small… There is no natural ‘saviour’waiting to assimilate all the anthropogenically-producedCO 2 in the coming century. 315A similar point applies to projects producing biofuels to replace petroleum.Gigantic plantati<strong>on</strong>s would be required just to replace a tiny

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!