13.07.2015 Views

annrep 1011 1 to 148.qxp - Department of Defence

annrep 1011 1 to 148.qxp - Department of Defence

annrep 1011 1 to 148.qxp - Department of Defence

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

D E P A R T M E N T O F D E F E N C E<strong>Department</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Defence</strong> and Military VeteransVote 21REPORT OF THE ACCOUNTING OFFICERfor the year ended 31 March 20111.6.2.4 The reallocation <strong>of</strong> Rm5,378 from Programme Air <strong>Defence</strong> <strong>to</strong> Programme Administration (Acquisition Services) forthe payment <strong>of</strong> Armscor <strong>to</strong> set up a system <strong>of</strong> Intellectual Property (IP) Management.1.6.2.5 The reallocation <strong>of</strong> Rm117,000 from Programme General Support (Joint Logistic Services) <strong>to</strong> ProgrammeAdministration (Ministerial Direction and Property Management) for the Multi Media Campaign (Rm8,000) andMunicipality Services (Rm109,000)1.6.2.6 The reallocation <strong>of</strong> funds between Programmes within the <strong>Defence</strong> Budget <strong>to</strong> defray expenditure in respect <strong>of</strong> authorisedlosses, compensation <strong>of</strong> employees and <strong>to</strong> balance the expenditure for the 2010/11 financial year.2. Services rendered2.1 The services rendered by the DOD are detailed in Part 1 Chapter 2 <strong>of</strong> the Annual Report.2.2 Tariff policyThe DOD tariff policy consists <strong>of</strong> the following elements:2.3 Free servicestariffs instituted by law,tariffs prescribed by a department that are applicable <strong>to</strong> all spheres <strong>of</strong> government; andtariffs unique <strong>to</strong> the DOD determined by the tariff owner and where the tariff structure is approved by theNational Treasury.Free services <strong>to</strong> the amount <strong>of</strong> Rm0,291 were provided by Naval Base Simon's Town <strong>to</strong> visiting foreign ships.3. Capacity Constraints and the impact there<strong>of</strong>Capacity constraints impacted again on the DOD across most functional areas.3.1 The downward trend in skills losses continued throughout the period under review resulting in some critical skills <strong>to</strong>be acquired from industry at exorbitant cost due <strong>to</strong> the expertise not being available in the department anymore.Although new personnel, as an initiative <strong>to</strong> address a joint human resource strategy for training and the utilisation <strong>of</strong>scarce human resources were recruited and trained, it will take time for these members <strong>to</strong> gain the necessary experience.The improved remuneration dispensation implemented during the year under review, is expected <strong>to</strong> decreasethe rate <strong>of</strong> loss <strong>of</strong> personnel at specifically the lower levels.3.2 The impact <strong>of</strong> non-repair and maintenance <strong>of</strong> <strong>Defence</strong> facilities has resulted in further dilapidation <strong>of</strong> DOD facilities.This continued <strong>to</strong> negatively affect service delivery. A forum has been established at a strategic level between the<strong>Department</strong>s <strong>of</strong> <strong>Defence</strong> and Public Works <strong>to</strong> ensure better service delivery and liaison between the two departments.This has already led <strong>to</strong> a slight improvement in services provided by the National <strong>Department</strong> <strong>of</strong> Public Works(NDPW). The phased approach <strong>to</strong> create own maintenance <strong>of</strong> facilities capability and migration away from relianceon the NDPW which was accepted by the DOD in the previous financial year has been pursued. In this regard, a<strong>Defence</strong> Works Capability has been established and has already undertaken some maintenance and repair tasks.3.3 The state <strong>of</strong> prime mission equipment, particularly in the Landward <strong>Defence</strong> programme, continued <strong>to</strong> decline <strong>to</strong> unacceptablelevels. Additional funding provided for maintenance and repair <strong>of</strong> the operational vehicle fleet has had someeffect, but is not sufficient <strong>to</strong> address this concern adequately. The rejuvenation <strong>of</strong> these capabilities therefore remainsone <strong>of</strong> the DOD's <strong>to</strong>p priorities. It is expected that in the ensuing financial year, this capacity will be upscaled.3.4 The shortage <strong>of</strong> specialists (technical staff) and support personnel continued <strong>to</strong> have a negative effect on the staffing<strong>of</strong> personnel <strong>to</strong> all the peace support missions, resulting in contingents not being fully staffed. This again has resultedin the non-compliance <strong>of</strong> minimum standards <strong>of</strong> serviceability <strong>of</strong> major equipment and as a result there<strong>of</strong> the DODANNUAL REPORT FY 2010/2011 159

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!