13.07.2015 Views

annrep 1011 1 to 148.qxp - Department of Defence

annrep 1011 1 to 148.qxp - Department of Defence

annrep 1011 1 to 148.qxp - Department of Defence

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

D E P A R T M E N T O F D E F E N C E<strong>Department</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Defence</strong> and Military VeteransVote 21REPORT OF THE AUDITOR-GENERAL TO PARLIAMENTON VOTE NO. 21: DEPARTMENT OF DEFENCEAND MILITARY VETERANSU n a u d i t e d s u p p l e m e n t a r y s c h e d u l e sThe supplementary information set out in annexures 1A <strong>to</strong> 6 on pages 255 <strong>to</strong> 269 do not form part <strong>of</strong> the financial statements andis presented as additional information. I have not audited these schedules and, accordingly, I do not express an opinion thereon.R E P O R T O N O T H E R L E G A L A N D R E G U L A T O R Y R E Q U I R E M E N T SIn accordance with the PAA and in terms <strong>of</strong> General notice 1111 <strong>of</strong> 2010, issued in Government Gazette 33872 <strong>of</strong> 15 December2010, I include below my findings on the annual performance report as set out on pages 23 <strong>to</strong> 93 and material non-compliancewith laws and regulations applicable <strong>to</strong> the department.P r e d e t e r m i n e d o b j e c t i v e sThere are no material findings on the annual performance report.C o m p l i a n c e w i t h l a w s a n d r e g u l a t i o n sI n t e r n a l A u d i tThe accounting <strong>of</strong>ficer did not ensure that an internal audit function was in place as per requirements <strong>of</strong> Treasury Regulation(TR) 3.2.2. However, the Inspec<strong>to</strong>r General did perform certain compliance and other procedures which were reported <strong>to</strong> theaudit committee.F i n a n c i a l m i s c o n d u c tSufficient appropriate audit evidence was not available in all instances, <strong>to</strong> determine if the accounting <strong>of</strong>ficer ensured that investigationswere conducted in<strong>to</strong> all allegations <strong>of</strong> financial misconduct made against <strong>of</strong>ficials within 30 days from the date <strong>of</strong> discovery<strong>of</strong> the allegation as required in terms <strong>of</strong> TR4.1.2.A n n u a l f i n a n c i a l s t a t e m e n t s , p e r f o r m a n c e a n d a n n u a l r e p o r tThe accounting <strong>of</strong>ficer did not implement adequate control systems for the safeguarding and maintenance <strong>of</strong> assets <strong>to</strong> preventtheft, losses, wastage and misuse, as required by the PFMA section 38(1)(d) and TR 10.1.1(a).The accounting <strong>of</strong>ficer submitted financial statements for auditing that were not prepared in all material aspects in accordancewith modified cash basis <strong>of</strong> accounting determined by the National Treasury, supported by full and proper records in all instancesas required by section 40(1)(a) and (b) <strong>of</strong> the PFMA. Certain material misstatements identified with regards <strong>to</strong> operating leasecommitments were subsequently corrected, however, the uncorrected material misstatements in capital assets resulted in thefinancial statements receiving a qualified audit opinion in contravention <strong>of</strong> section 40(3)(a).H u m a n r e s o u r c e m a n a g e m e n t a n d c o m p e n s a t i o nSome senior managers did not enter in<strong>to</strong> a performance agreement for the current year as per the requirements <strong>of</strong> PSR 4/III/B.1and <strong>Department</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Defence</strong> Instruction: POL and PLAN No. 00065/2002 (Edition 2) dated 1 January 2005.180ANNUAL REPORT FY 2010/2011

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!