TRIPLE HELIX noms.pmd

Norwegian processing industry specialised in silicon has over many years developed its expertise and we argue that it is by nomeans dominated or even locked-in by low-tech technology. The industry could profit from low energy prices and developed veryefficient process technologies. The high diversity of advanced technology approaches funded by the industry indicates thisindustry is advanced also in a global comparison. The research institute sector and especially IFE and Sintef are eager to servethis industry and have invested in infrastructure and people to enable this task. The only bottleneck highlighted by the industryis a lack of human capital from national universities. Research collaboration is addressing these shortcomings.ContributionsThis paper is rather novel combining data analysis of public funding on solar photovoltaic research and innovation with qualitativeanalysis of interviews. It will explore in what degree the triple helix model can explain recent developments in the Norwegiansolar photovoltaic industry and will address shortcomings of this model. The Triple Helix model should also be adapted toexplain dynamics related to important environmental issues and policy initiatives related to CO2 emissions etc.ImplicationsThe project will have implications for future analysis of the national and regional interaction between industry, universities,research institutes and government.ReferencesCooke, P. (2005). "Regionally asymmetric knowledge capabilities and open innovation: Exploring ‘Globalisation 2’ - A newmodel of industry organisation." Research Policy 34: 1128–1149.Etxkowitz, H. and M. Klofsten (2005). "The innovating region: toward a theory of knowledge-based regional development." R&DManagement 35(3): 243-255.Narula, R. (2002). "Innovation systems and ‘inertia’ in R&D location: Norwegian firms and the role of systemic lock-in." ResearchPolicy 31: 795–816.Madrid, October 20, 21 & 22 - 2010181