TRIPLE HELIX noms.pmd

In sum, the analysis shows that both STI and DUI indicator are significantly related to innovation results. These results areespecially relevant both to confirm the theoretical linkage between STI factors and innovation outputs, but also for public policyas it can direct resources towards those programs guaranteeing impact and efficacy.Selected Bibliography- Arundel A., Lorenz E., Lundvall B.A. & Valeyre F. (2007), How Europe’s economies learn: a comparison of work organizationand innovation modes for the EU-15, Industrial and Corporate Change, Vol.16 (6), pp.1175-1210.- Cooke P. (2006), Reflections on the research and conclusions for policy, in Cooke P., De Laurentis C., Todtling F. & TripplM., Regional Knowledge Economies, Elgar.- Etkowitz H. y Leydersdorff L. (2000), The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and ‘Mode 2’ to a Triple helix ofuniversity-industry-government relations, Research Policy, Vol. 29, pp.109-123.- Jensen M., Johnson B., Lorenz E. & Lundvall B.A. (2007), Forms of knowledge and modes of innovation, Research Policy,Vol.36, pp.680-693.- Navarro M., Gibaja J., Bilbao B. & Aguado R. (2009), Patterns of Innovation in EU-25 regions: a typology and policyrecommendations, Environment and Planning C, Vol.27, pp.815-840.- Parrilli M.D., Aranguren M.J. and Larrea M. (2010), The dole of interactive learning to close the innovation gap in SME-basedeconomies, European Planning Studies, Vol.18(3), pp.531-548.Madrid, October 20, 21 & 22 - 2010258