TRIPLE HELIX noms.pmd

- with foreign actors concerning distribution of property rights in case of joint activity;- with parental organization concerning distribution of intellectual property rights on R&D results.IMPLICATIONSSince participants of the innovation process are not always acknowledged about the needs, interests and goals of each other,in practice the resolution of conflicts of interests often takes place with low efficiency and sub-optimal distribution of resources.Detection of these conflicts and disclosure of them should be a part of the innovation management strategies in practical activityof each RSO and other relevant actors of the national innovation system. The forms of management, reduction and eliminationof these conflicts that have already emerged in practice should be benchmarked and disseminated. Elaboration of solutions forconflicts imposed by system is an important direction of the regional and national innovation policy.REFERENCES- Davis, M. and A. Stark. Conflict of interest in the professions. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.- Granstrand, O. Towards a theory of the technology-based firm // Research Policy. – 1998. – Vol. 27. – P. 465–489.- Mustar, P., M. Wright and B. Clarysse. University spin-off firms: lessons from ten years of experience in Europe // Scienceand Public Policy. – 2008. – Vol. 35, ¹ 2. – P. 67–80.- Pavitt, K. Patterns of technical change: towards a taxonomy and theory // Research Policy. – 1984. – Vol. 13. – P. 343–374.- Smallbone, D., A. Slonimski and A. Pobol. Struggling to survive: the case of a new technology-based enterprise in Belarus// Innovation and entrepreneurship: successful start-ups and businesses in emerging economies / eds.: R. Aidis, F. Welter.– Edward Elgar, 2008. – P. 29–47.Madrid, October 20, 21 & 22 - 2010265