Table of Contents 6 2012 OVATION Awards Winning Entries
6. 2012 OVATION Awards Winning Entries - IABC/Toronto
6. 2012 OVATION Awards Winning Entries - IABC/Toronto
- No tags were found...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>OVATION</strong> <strong>Awards</strong> <strong>Winning</strong> Entry<br />
Communication Management<br />
Media Relations with budget up to $50,000<br />
AWARD OF EXCELLENCE<br />
Entrant’s Name: Julie Rusciolelli, Natalia Smalyuk and Kirsten Walkom<br />
Organization: MAVERICK Public Relations and People for Good<br />
Division 1: Communications Management<br />
Category 4A: Media Relations with budget up to $50K (pro bono)<br />
Title <strong>of</strong> Entry: Promoting People for Good<br />
Time Period: July 1 – November 30, 2011<br />
Brief Description: MAVERICK designed and implemented this pro bono, strategically timed media<br />
relations campaign to guide public discourse and facilitate positive public perception <strong>of</strong> People for Good<br />
to encourage the generosity <strong>of</strong> spirit among Canadians.<br />
Business Need/Opportunity<br />
In Canada, 160000 non‐pr<strong>of</strong>it causes compete for donations. People for Good, a social movement<br />
encouraging generosity <strong>of</strong> spirit among Canadians, also asks for donations – but <strong>of</strong> a different kind.<br />
Formed by a team <strong>of</strong> marketing and advertising leaders, People for Good, a creative campaign<br />
harnessing the power <strong>of</strong> the media to make a social difference, asks for a donation <strong>of</strong> goodness, one<br />
good deed at a time. Despite its philanthropic intentions, from a media relations perspective, the<br />
question is: how does one “pitch” what is, quite literally, an ad campaign?<br />
Seeing the opportunity where others might have seen a challenge, MAVERICK felt it was a matter <strong>of</strong><br />
faith in the value and authenticity <strong>of</strong> the cause that might appear superficial or self‐interested to some.<br />
The brainchild <strong>of</strong> Zak Mroueh, president & creative director at Zulu Alpha Kilo, and Mark Sherman,<br />
chairman at Media Experts, People for Good was inspired by its founders’ intensely personal vision <strong>of</strong><br />
how the creative medium can become the message at the service <strong>of</strong> a good cause. Zak and Mark felt<br />
that Canadians – especially in large urban centers – were increasingly inattentive and even rude to each<br />
other. Believing the world can use more creativity, they were on a mission to spark a social movement<br />
to get Canadians be nicer to each other. As simple as that.<br />
Their solution? Touch every Canadian with a simple message – care about people around you, be nice to<br />
each other, do good. Small good deeds – even as basic as genuinely saying „„thank you’’ to someone –<br />
make a big difference in creating that social glue that holds us together as a community.<br />
This passionate and perhaps idealistic “reading” <strong>of</strong> the state <strong>of</strong> the world – far from a rational,<br />
sociologically solid claim based on hard evidence and facts – resulted in a bold and emotional coast‐tocoast<br />
creative campaign. Executed across major Canadian cities, including Toronto, Vancouver,<br />
Edmonton, Calgary, Montréal and Halifax, it ran between June 1 and November 30, 2011. Using a mix <strong>of</strong><br />
humorous and highly interactive multimedia messages, the campaign included outdoor advertising,<br />
interactive, print, experiential and online advertising, as well as social media platforms where anyone<br />
could share their own ideas for good. Multiple media partners donated their time and capabilities to<br />
bring this campaign to life.<br />
While People for Good had the potential for many interesting conversations, there was a risk that Zak<br />
and Mark’s idealism would not resonate with Canadians. The public and the media could interpret the<br />
campaign through a filter <strong>of</strong> cynicism and mistrust, despite the altruistic intentions <strong>of</strong> its creators.