Migrant Smuggling Data and Research
zgw9fv2
zgw9fv2
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
of Austria (FPG), n.d.; Federal Act on Foreign Nationals Act (FNA), n.d.; Greek<br />
Code on Migration or Greek Law N.4251/2014); a similar approach is followed<br />
by the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia (European Migration Network,<br />
2014). The so-called humanitarian clause, absolving from criminal liability<br />
those who assist persons in distress, is only foreseen in the Greek <strong>and</strong> Spanish<br />
legislation. The United Kingdom has transposed an analogous provision but<br />
has restricted its scope to persons acting pro bono on behalf of a human rights<br />
organization (Carrera, 2016).<br />
Even wider disparities are present when it comes to criminalizing the<br />
facilitation of unauthorized “stay” in the country. A 2016 survey of national laws<br />
revealed that France, Greece <strong>and</strong> the United Kingdom do not require financial<br />
gain to punish facilitation of stay; the opposite approach is followed by Germany,<br />
Hungary, Italy, the Netherl<strong>and</strong>s <strong>and</strong> Spain. Likewise, France, Germany, Italy <strong>and</strong><br />
the Netherl<strong>and</strong>s exempt from criminal liability those who facilitate unauthorized<br />
stay for humanitarian purpose; France only exempts those who assist family<br />
members, while Germany entails exemptions only for those who conduct specific<br />
professional duties (Carrera, 2016).<br />
As regards the type <strong>and</strong> severity of punishment, also here a great<br />
variety of sentences have been identified, ranging from a fine <strong>and</strong> 1–2 years<br />
imprisonment (such as Austria, Germany <strong>and</strong> Spain) to 10 years in the case of<br />
Greece <strong>and</strong> 14 years in the United Kingdom. Some national orders, such as Italy,<br />
entail different sentences for facilitation of unauthorized stay <strong>and</strong> entry carry<br />
different sentences, while others, such as Greece <strong>and</strong> the Netherl<strong>and</strong>s, do not<br />
make such a distinction (AufenthG, 2004; FPG, n.d.; FNA, n.d.; Greek Code on<br />
Migration; European Migration Network, 2014).<br />
Finally, the territorial scope of the definition also varies. Some European<br />
countries sanction not only the facilitation of movement <strong>and</strong> stay in their own<br />
country but also in other Member States. Even then, the approaches differ.<br />
Hungary, for instance, sanctions only the facilitation of transit <strong>and</strong> stay in another<br />
Member State. Italy only sanctions the facilitation of entry <strong>and</strong> transit. Spain<br />
<strong>and</strong> the United Kingdom sanction all three categories (Carrera, 2016). Germany<br />
punishes the facilitation of entry into, transit <strong>and</strong> stay in any other Schengen<br />
country, while the Netherl<strong>and</strong>s sanctions the facilitation of entry, transit <strong>and</strong><br />
stay in any country that is a party to the UN Protocol against <strong>Smuggling</strong> (Carrera,<br />
2016).<br />
Once theory is translated into practice <strong>and</strong> in the absence of st<strong>and</strong>ardized<br />
procedures, there are significant divergence across national jurisdictions in the<br />
way situations are interpreted <strong>and</strong> data registered, the precise extent of which is<br />
120<br />
5. Europe