18.11.2016 Views

Migrant Smuggling Data and Research

zgw9fv2

zgw9fv2

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

of Austria (FPG), n.d.; Federal Act on Foreign Nationals Act (FNA), n.d.; Greek<br />

Code on Migration or Greek Law N.4251/2014); a similar approach is followed<br />

by the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia (European Migration Network,<br />

2014). The so-called humanitarian clause, absolving from criminal liability<br />

those who assist persons in distress, is only foreseen in the Greek <strong>and</strong> Spanish<br />

legislation. The United Kingdom has transposed an analogous provision but<br />

has restricted its scope to persons acting pro bono on behalf of a human rights<br />

organization (Carrera, 2016).<br />

Even wider disparities are present when it comes to criminalizing the<br />

facilitation of unauthorized “stay” in the country. A 2016 survey of national laws<br />

revealed that France, Greece <strong>and</strong> the United Kingdom do not require financial<br />

gain to punish facilitation of stay; the opposite approach is followed by Germany,<br />

Hungary, Italy, the Netherl<strong>and</strong>s <strong>and</strong> Spain. Likewise, France, Germany, Italy <strong>and</strong><br />

the Netherl<strong>and</strong>s exempt from criminal liability those who facilitate unauthorized<br />

stay for humanitarian purpose; France only exempts those who assist family<br />

members, while Germany entails exemptions only for those who conduct specific<br />

professional duties (Carrera, 2016).<br />

As regards the type <strong>and</strong> severity of punishment, also here a great<br />

variety of sentences have been identified, ranging from a fine <strong>and</strong> 1–2 years<br />

imprisonment (such as Austria, Germany <strong>and</strong> Spain) to 10 years in the case of<br />

Greece <strong>and</strong> 14 years in the United Kingdom. Some national orders, such as Italy,<br />

entail different sentences for facilitation of unauthorized stay <strong>and</strong> entry carry<br />

different sentences, while others, such as Greece <strong>and</strong> the Netherl<strong>and</strong>s, do not<br />

make such a distinction (AufenthG, 2004; FPG, n.d.; FNA, n.d.; Greek Code on<br />

Migration; European Migration Network, 2014).<br />

Finally, the territorial scope of the definition also varies. Some European<br />

countries sanction not only the facilitation of movement <strong>and</strong> stay in their own<br />

country but also in other Member States. Even then, the approaches differ.<br />

Hungary, for instance, sanctions only the facilitation of transit <strong>and</strong> stay in another<br />

Member State. Italy only sanctions the facilitation of entry <strong>and</strong> transit. Spain<br />

<strong>and</strong> the United Kingdom sanction all three categories (Carrera, 2016). Germany<br />

punishes the facilitation of entry into, transit <strong>and</strong> stay in any other Schengen<br />

country, while the Netherl<strong>and</strong>s sanctions the facilitation of entry, transit <strong>and</strong><br />

stay in any country that is a party to the UN Protocol against <strong>Smuggling</strong> (Carrera,<br />

2016).<br />

Once theory is translated into practice <strong>and</strong> in the absence of st<strong>and</strong>ardized<br />

procedures, there are significant divergence across national jurisdictions in the<br />

way situations are interpreted <strong>and</strong> data registered, the precise extent of which is<br />

120<br />

5. Europe

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!