02.03.2018 Views

Documents of the Right Word

A collection of small books written by Sunni scholars for answering Shi'a claims.

A collection of small books written by Sunni scholars for answering Shi'a claims.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

to rescue <strong>the</strong>m from this sinful position.<br />

Answer: The hundred and sixty-fourth âyat <strong>of</strong> En’âm sûra and<br />

<strong>the</strong> fifteenth âyat <strong>of</strong> Isrâ sûra purport, “No sinner will also have<br />

<strong>the</strong> responsibility for someone else’s sin.” Supposing, [though<br />

impossible], hadrat Abû Bekr and hadrat ’Umar ‘radiy-Allâhu<br />

ta’âlâ anhumâ’ and most <strong>of</strong> Rasûlullah’s ‘alaihis-salâm’ Sahâba<br />

somehow committed a sin, this sin would not have any effect on<br />

hadrat Alî according to this âyat-i-kerîma, and it would still not be<br />

necessary for him to fight on account <strong>of</strong> it. Then, would it ever be<br />

possible for him to commence a fight that would cause hundreds <strong>of</strong><br />

millions <strong>of</strong> people to be burned eternally in Hell?<br />

This faqîr, [that is, ’Uthmân Efendi ‘rahima-hullahu ta’âlâ],<br />

asked one <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Shi’î scholars, “Hadrat Fâtima’s ‘radiy-Allâhu<br />

anh’ being <strong>of</strong>fended with <strong>the</strong> As-hâb-i-kirâm for not giving her <strong>the</strong><br />

date orchard would mean fondness for <strong>the</strong> world, which in turn<br />

would be something impermissible.” He replied,“Her being<br />

<strong>of</strong>fended did not originate from fondness for <strong>the</strong> world. It was<br />

because she did not like a wicked deed.” With this evasive answer<br />

he blemished Rasûlullah’s ‘sall-Allâhu alaihi wa sallam’ daughter,<br />

who was as clean as pure water. For something done in a manner<br />

compatible with Islam would sound wicked only to <strong>the</strong> nafs-iammâra.<br />

I remembered this fact and made <strong>the</strong> following<br />

explanation. He was so stupefied that he could say nothing. My<br />

explanation was: Everyone reading history knows this event: In a<br />

Holy War Imâm-i-Alî ‘radiy-Allâhu anh’ threw an unbeliever<br />

down to <strong>the</strong> ground and was about to deal him <strong>the</strong> fatal blow,<br />

when his desperate opponent spat all <strong>the</strong> foul contents in his<br />

mouth out into his face. His face dirtied all over, <strong>the</strong> imâm gave up<br />

killing <strong>the</strong> unbeliever. The unbeliever, who was already out <strong>of</strong> his<br />

mind, was bewildered all <strong>the</strong> more. “Why did you give up,” he<br />

asked. “Are you afraid?” Hadrat Alî ‘radiy-Allâhu anh’ let <strong>the</strong><br />

unbeliever go, saying, “I was going to kill you with <strong>the</strong><br />

commandment <strong>of</strong> Allâhu ta’âlâ because you would not become a<br />

Muslim. But now my nafs is your enemy because <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> foul act<br />

you have done. If I kill you now, I will have done so to do <strong>the</strong> wish<br />

<strong>of</strong> my nafs. Thus my killing you will earn me sinfulness instead <strong>of</strong><br />

thawâb.” Upon hearing <strong>the</strong>se statements, <strong>the</strong> unbeliever admired<br />

<strong>the</strong> superiority <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Islamic religion on which Imâm-i-Alî’s<br />

conscience was based and uttered <strong>the</strong> word kalima-i-shahâdat with<br />

all his heart, thus becoming a Muslim willingly. The two people,<br />

who were mortal enemies a few minutes earlier, were now<br />

bro<strong>the</strong>rs hugging each o<strong>the</strong>r.<br />

– 122 –

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!