02.03.2018 Views

Documents of the Right Word

A collection of small books written by Sunni scholars for answering Shi'a claims.

A collection of small books written by Sunni scholars for answering Shi'a claims.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

elonged to hadrat Alî by rights ‘radiy-Allâhu anhumâ’. Why did<br />

hadrat Alî accept this usurped right later? Fur<strong>the</strong>rmore, why did<br />

hadrat Huseyn ‘radiy-Allâhu ta’âlâ anh’ try to win his usurped<br />

right <strong>of</strong> caliphate back from Yezîd so earnestly that he attained<br />

martyrdom in <strong>the</strong> end?<br />

2) “Hadrat Alî imitated hadrat Fâtima ‘radiy-Allâhu anhumâ’<br />

and did not accept any share from Fedek,” <strong>the</strong>y say.<br />

This answer <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>irs is even more unsound. Then why did <strong>the</strong><br />

Imâms who accepted Fedek (afterwards) not imitate hadrat<br />

Fâtima? If it was a farz to imitate her, why did <strong>the</strong>y ignore this<br />

farz? If it was supererogatory and not farz, <strong>the</strong>n why did hadrat Alî<br />

do this supererogatory act at <strong>the</strong> cost <strong>of</strong> omitting an act that was<br />

farz? For it is farz to give everyone his or her due. Moreover, it<br />

might be reasonable to imitate someone’s optional behaviour. If<br />

this behaviour is a result <strong>of</strong> coersion it should not be imitated. If<br />

hadrat Fâtima’s ‘radiy-Allâhu ta’âlâ anhâ’ not utilizing Fedek was<br />

due to someone else’s oppression, <strong>the</strong>n she had to waive her right<br />

because she had no o<strong>the</strong>r way. In this case it would have been<br />

senseless to imitate her.<br />

3) “Hadrat Alî ‘radiy-Allâhu ta’âlâ’ had witnessed Fedek’s<br />

being bequea<strong>the</strong>d to hadrat Fâtima. In order to show that this<br />

witnessing was done for Allah’s sake and not for worldly<br />

advantages, he did not accept any advantage from Fedek,” <strong>the</strong>y<br />

say.<br />

This answer <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>irs is weak, too. Those who knew about<br />

hadrat Alî’s witnessing and those who rejected it were dead by <strong>the</strong><br />

time he became Khalîfa. Fur<strong>the</strong>rmore, some Imâms’ accepting <strong>the</strong><br />

orchard named Fedek made <strong>the</strong> group called Khârijî consider that<br />

hadrat Alî might have done this witnessing in order to obtain<br />

advantages for his children. In fact, in matters concerning real<br />

estates, such as fields, houses, vineyards and orchards, one thinks<br />

<strong>of</strong> one’s children’s advantages ra<strong>the</strong>r than one’s own. Perhaps,<br />

hadrat Alî might have advised his children not to utilize Fedek lest<br />

his witnessing be tarnished. And his children might have refused<br />

Fedek both to imitate hadrat Fâtima and to fulfil this secret advice.<br />

Such is scholars’ commentation on <strong>the</strong> matter.<br />

4) “Hadrat Alî’s not accepting <strong>the</strong> orchard called Fedek was<br />

intended for Taqiyya. Taqiyya is necessary for Shiites,” <strong>the</strong>y say.<br />

Taqiyya means to get on well with people one does not like.<br />

This statement <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>irs is untenable, too. For, according to<br />

Shiites, “when an Imâm takes <strong>the</strong> battlefield and begins to fight it<br />

– 218 –

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!