02.03.2018 Views

Documents of the Right Word

A collection of small books written by Sunni scholars for answering Shi'a claims.

A collection of small books written by Sunni scholars for answering Shi'a claims.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

animosity towards hadrat Alî since <strong>the</strong> so-called earliest times,” he<br />

states.<br />

Islamic scholars have given valuable answers to Hurûfîs’<br />

slanders and innumerable books have been written to this effect.<br />

One <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>m is <strong>the</strong> book Izâlat-ul-hafâ an khilâfat-il-khulafâ, by<br />

Shâh Waliyyullah Dahlawî, one <strong>of</strong> India’s greatest Islamic<br />

scholars. Toge<strong>the</strong>r with its Persian and Urdu versions, it comprises<br />

two books. It was reproduced in Pakistan in 1382 [A.D. 1962]. It<br />

explains in a splendid style and in detail how superior each and<br />

every one <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> As-hâb-i-kirâm was. We shall give our response<br />

with <strong>the</strong> translation <strong>of</strong> a passage from <strong>the</strong> book Tuhfa-i-Isnâ<br />

Ash’ariyya, which was written in Persian by Abd-ul-’azîz ’Umarî<br />

Dahlawî. This scholar was Shâh Waliyyullah Ahmad Dahlawî’s<br />

son. He passed away in Delhi in 1239 [A.D. 1824]. The book Tuhfa<br />

exists in <strong>the</strong> library <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> University <strong>of</strong> Istanbul with <strong>the</strong> code<br />

number 82024. Its Urdu version was printed in Pakistan. Abd-ul-<br />

’azîz Dahlawî states:<br />

In a hadîth-i-sherîf reported by hadrat Abû Sa’îd-i-Hudrî, our<br />

Prophet ‘sall-Allâhu alaihi wa sallam’ says to hadrat Alî, “As I<br />

fight over <strong>the</strong> revelation <strong>of</strong> Qur’ân al-kerîm, so you will fight over<br />

its interpretation.” This hadîth-i-sherîf shows that Sunnites are<br />

right. For it informs that in <strong>the</strong> combats <strong>of</strong> Camel and Siffîn <strong>the</strong>re<br />

will be disagreements in <strong>the</strong> interpretation <strong>of</strong> Qur’ân al-kerîm, that<br />

is, <strong>the</strong>re will be different ijtihâds. Their quoting this hadîth-i-sherîf<br />

for refuting Sunnites is an indication <strong>of</strong> sheer ignorance. For this<br />

hadîth-i-sherîf shows that those who fought against hadrat Alî (in<br />

<strong>the</strong> combats <strong>of</strong> Camel and Siffîn) were wrong in <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

interpretation <strong>of</strong> Qur’ân al-kerîm. And it is a fact admitted by<br />

Shiites as well that wrong interpretation <strong>of</strong> Qur’ân al-kerîm is not<br />

a cause <strong>of</strong> disbelief.<br />

2- “While one <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>m was vying for <strong>the</strong> <strong>of</strong>fice <strong>of</strong> caliphate,<br />

putting forward his old age, ano<strong>the</strong>r was fighting to bring o<strong>the</strong>rs<br />

into subjection,” he says.<br />

With <strong>the</strong> expressions ‘old age’ and ‘vying for <strong>the</strong> <strong>of</strong>fice <strong>of</strong><br />

caliphate’, he casts allusions to hadrat Abû Bekr. That hadrat<br />

Abû Bekr was elected Khalîfa by <strong>the</strong> unanimous vote <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

Sahâba and that hadrat Alî said, “I know Abû Bekr is superior to<br />

us all,” are naked facts written in full detail in books by all<br />

scholars. Many a time <strong>the</strong> Messenger <strong>of</strong> Allah ‘sall-Allâhu alaihi<br />

wa sallam’ appointed hadrat Abû Bekr as <strong>the</strong> Emîr. After <strong>the</strong><br />

Holy War <strong>of</strong> Uhud some intelligence arrived informing that Abû<br />

Sufyân was going to attack Medîna. Rasûlullah ‘sall-Allâhu alaihi<br />

– 214 –

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!