20.10.2018 Views

knjiga solarna energija dobra

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

DESIGN CONCEPTS OF TF-SI SOLAR CELLS 333<br />

35<br />

MACD and metal loss<br />

[mA/cm 2 ]<br />

30<br />

25<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

MACD<br />

5<br />

Metal loss<br />

0<br />

0<br />

20 40<br />

Area ratio<br />

[%]<br />

60<br />

80 100<br />

Figure 8.19 Calculated MACD and metal loss as functions of area ratio for a Si cell with<br />

10-µm-thick absorber<br />

8.3.2.4 Summary from optical modeling<br />

From the analysis performed in the preceding sections, we can make some conclusions<br />

about the structure of the thin-film solar cells:<br />

1. The thickness of the cell should be 10 to 20 µm in order to get satisfactory J SC .<br />

2. The best structure will be front-surface-textured/backside-polished or front-surface<br />

textured/backside-textured.<br />

3. The texture pits should be as sharp as possible, and should occupy the entire surface<br />

of the cells.<br />

8.3.3 Electronic Modeling<br />

A generalized electronic model of a TF-Si solar cell should address features such as<br />

nonuniformities arising from grain boundaries (GBs) and intragrain defects, as well as<br />

detailed optical generation resulting from light-trapping, as illustrated in the previous<br />

section. Clearly, this requires a 3-D modeling capability. 3-D modeling is also needed<br />

to include metal contacts appropriately. Unfortunately, no modeling package suitable for<br />

this purpose is available at this time.<br />

There are two major problems in building an appropriate modeling software for a<br />

polycrystalline Si device. First, it is difficult to model electrical fields, recombination, and<br />

boundary conditions at GBs and other crystal defects (later we will show one approach<br />

to handle fields associated with defects). Second, it is difficult to assign values to parameters<br />

associated with defects and GBs. This is because the grain-boundary parameters<br />

depend strongly on the interactions of these defects with impurities. For example, clean<br />

GBs have been found to have very little electron beam–induced current (EBIC) contrast

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!