20.10.2018 Views

knjiga solarna energija dobra

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

858 ELECTROCHEMICAL STORAGE FOR PHOTOVOLTAICS<br />

and to check the general state of the battery. The set points of the charge controllers or<br />

the battery management should be checked. For a 48 V battery system with single cells,<br />

30 to 60 min for the maintenance are necessary.<br />

Figure 18.31 gives an example of the cost share of the battery in a PV battery<br />

system. The system is designed to supply power with 100% reliability at a location in<br />

Mexico. The left-side graphs show a system that was designed to minimise the initial<br />

investment costs under the given boundary conditions. The right-side graphs show the<br />

results of a minimisation of the lifetime costs. The calculation includes the initial investment<br />

costs, maintenance, repair and replacement of the components, capital costs and<br />

other operating costs. It can be seen from the graphs that the lifetime costs are 288% or<br />

248% of the costs for the initial investment. Sizing of the system with respect to lifetime<br />

costs resulted, in this example, in an overall cost reduction of 14%. It is interesting to<br />

see that this was achieved by approximately 20% higher investments in the PV generator.<br />

This allows on one hand a reduction of battery size by approximately 25% and on<br />

the other hand the larger PV generator allows a more frequent complete charging of the<br />

battery and therefore a lifetime extension. This altogether resulted in a cost reduction for<br />

the battery of more than 40% and – as mentioned above – for the overall system of 14%.<br />

Initial investment (cost index = 100%)<br />

sorted by components<br />

Battery<br />

26%<br />

Electrical<br />

installation<br />

23%<br />

Planning<br />

13%<br />

PV<br />

generator<br />

28%<br />

Inverter<br />

10%<br />

Initial investment (cost index = 102%)<br />

sorted by components<br />

Electrical<br />

installation<br />

22%<br />

Battery<br />

20%<br />

Planning<br />

13%<br />

PV<br />

generator<br />

35%<br />

Inverter<br />

10%<br />

20 years lifetime costs (cost index = 288%)<br />

sorted by components<br />

Battery<br />

43%<br />

20 years lifetime costs (cost index = 248%)<br />

sorted by components<br />

Battery<br />

29%<br />

Electrical<br />

installation<br />

21%<br />

Planning<br />

8%<br />

Inverter<br />

9%<br />

PV<br />

generator<br />

19%<br />

Electrical<br />

installation<br />

24% Planning<br />

9%<br />

Inverter<br />

10%<br />

PV<br />

generator<br />

28%<br />

Figure 18.31 Comparison of costs for a PV battery system derived under different assumptions. Left-side<br />

graphs show the costs for the system optimised by initial investment costs, right-side graphs show the costs<br />

for a system optimised by lifetime costs. The overall costs for the initial investments (upper graphs) and the<br />

overall lifetime costs (lower graphs) calculated according to the annuity method are normalised to the initial<br />

investment costs for the system optimised by initial investment (cost index = 100%). Location, Mexico;<br />

annual power consumption, 1500 kWh; effective interest rate, 6%; lifetime of components: PVgenerator<br />

20 years, electronic components 15 years, battery according to sizing and operating conditions, calculations<br />

and optimisation done with the simulation tool TALCO[42]

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!